State v. Ayscue, 436

Decision Date28 April 1954
Docket NumberNo. 436,436
PartiesSTATE, v. AYSCUE.
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court

John F. Matthews, Louisburg, for defendant-appellant.

Atty. Gen. Harry McMullan and Asst. Atty. Gen. Ralph Moody for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, being without counsel in the trial below, seeks to challenge in this Court for the first time (1) the admissibility of portions of the evidence adduced against him, and (2) the sufficiency of the evidence to carry the case to the jury. However, the record discloses no objection to any of the evidence nor motion for judgment as of nonsuit. In fact, nowhere in the record is there an objection or exception to any ruling of the trial court. The objections, first made in this Court, come too late. Decision here is controlled by what is said in State v. Howell, 239 N.C. 78, 79 S.E.2d 235, and State v. Gaston, 236 N.C. 499, 73 S.E.2d 311.

True, the appeal itself is an exception to the judgment, State v. Sloan, 238 N.C. 672, 78 S.E.2d 738, but the judgment appears to be regular in form and is supported by the verdict. It would seem the defendant has applied to the wrong forum.

No error.

To continue reading

Request your trial
14 cases
  • State v. Hudson, 15
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • April 12, 1972
    ...considered an exception to the judgment and presents for review any error appearing on the face of the record proper. State v. Ayscue, 240 N.C. 196, 81 S.E.2d 403 (1954); State v. Elliott, 269 N.C. 683, 153 S.E.2d 330 (1967). Unless error appears on the face of the record proper, the judgme......
  • State v. Moore, 6926SC395
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • November 19, 1969
    ...262. An appeal itself is an exception to the judgment which presents for review error appearing on the face of the record. State v. Ayscue, 240 N.C. 196, 81 S.E.2d 403; State v. Williams, 235 N.C. 429, 70 S.E.2d 1; State v. Hitchcock, 4 N.C.App. 676, 167 S.E.2d Even though the charge and ev......
  • State v. Benfield, 7025SC133
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • May 19, 1970
    ... ... State v. Barham, 251 N.C. 207, 110 S.E.2d 894; State v. Ayscue, 240 N.C. 196, 81 S.E.2d 403; State v. Sloan, 238 N.C. 672, 78 S.E.2d 738; State v. Oliver, 213 N.C. 386, 196 S.E. 325, Supra.' ... ...
  • State v. Crabb, 7023SC375
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • August 26, 1970
    ... ... [9 N.C.App. 335] State v. Ayscue, 240 N.C. 196, 81 S.E.2d 403; State v. Williams, 235 N.C. 429, 70 S.E.2d 1; State v. Hitchcock, 4 N.C.App. 676, 167 S.E.2d 545. The record proper in ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT