State v. Bailey
Decision Date | 31 January 1864 |
Citation | 34 Mo. 350 |
Parties | STATE OF MISSOURI, Appellant, v. WALTER W. BAILEY, Respondent. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from Sullivan County Court.
Welsh, (Attorney General,) for appellant.
Bailey was indicted for perjury; upon his motion the indictment was quashed, and the State appealed to this court.
The indictment charged, that a suit before a justice of the peace ...
To continue reading
Request your trial8 cases
-
State v. Brinkley
...jury can be the subject of perjury before it. Such materiality must, of course, be alleged and proved. Hinch v. State, 2 Mo. 158; State v. Bailey, 34 Mo. 350. (23) The information studiously avoided the issue whether police beat defendant or Melendes, and attempted to assign perjury upon im......
-
The State v. Jennings
...immaterial, to the issue, does not constitute the crime of perjury." Hinch v. State, 2 Mo. 158; Martin v. Miller, 4 Mo. 47; State v. Bailey, 34 Mo. 350; State v. Wakefield, 9 Mo.App. 326. (2) The erred in overruling defendant's plea in abatement, the defendant being under sentence at the ti......
- The State v. Martin
-
Kizer v. People
...40 Kan. 631, 20 Pac. 529;People v. Brilliant, 58 Cal. 214;People v. Gaige, 26 Mich. 30;State v. Sutton, 147 Ind. 158, 46 N. E. 468;State v. Bailey, 34 Mo. 350;Roberts v. People, 99 Ill. 275. In support of the proposition that the indictment must aver it was material to the issue or point in......
Request a trial to view additional results