State v. Baker

Decision Date11 March 1946
Docket Number4403
Citation192 S.W.2d 977,209 Ark. 896
PartiesState v. Baker
CourtArkansas Supreme Court

Appeal from Independence Circuit Court; S. M. Bone, Judge.

Affirmed.

Harry L. Ponder, Jr., Guy E. Williams, Attorney General, and Oscar E. Ellis, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant.

R W. Tucker, for appellee.

OPINION

McHaney J.

Appellee is the sheriff of Independence county, Arkansas. The grand jury of said county returned two indictments against him at the fall 1945 term of court, each charging him of the crime of misdemeanor in office, in one that he did, on the 5th day of February, 1945, "willfully and unlawfully fail, neglect and refuse to render his accounts to, and settle with the County Court for moneys by him received, to the use of Independence county in the manner and at the time provided by § 3534 of Pope's Digest and § 12 of Initiated Act No. 1, of Independence county." In the other, the date of the alleged failure, etc., was on the 5th day of January, 1945, and in the charging part the language is substantially the same as above quoted.

Trial resulted in an instructed verdict of not guilty for appellee, the two cases having been consolidated for trial, and judgment was entered discharging him. The State has appealed under the provisions of §§ 4253 and 4254 of Pope's Digest to have said § 3534 construed by this court and, if so found, to have error of the trial court declared "to the end there may be correct and uniform administration of the criminal law."

At the outset appellant is confronted with the motion of appellee to affirm for failure to comply with rule 10 of this court which requires appellant in criminal cases to file with the clerk of this court a brief and abstract or abridgment of the transcript as in civil cases. Rule 9 (b) provides that the abstract shall contain the material parts of the pleadings, proceedings, facts and documents upon which appellant relies, together with such other matters from the record as are necessary to an understanding of all questions presented to this court for decision. These rules apply to the State in a misdemeanor case when it is the appellant just as they do to a defendant who appeals from a conviction in such a case.

Here counsel for the State say they will set out such of the evidence, as they deem necessary to a decision of the question presented, in their argument. In the argument they say: "The court will notice from an...

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Ellis v. State
    • United States
    • Arkansas Court of Appeals
    • November 7, 1979
    ...given, and will assume the jury was properly instructed. Chapman v. State, 201 Ark. 91, 143 S.W.2d 575 (1940), State v. Baker, 209 Ark. 896, 192 S.W.2d 977 (1946), Branton v. State,214 Ark. 861, 218 S.W.2d 690 (1949). Ark.Stat.Ann. § 43-2725 (Act 333 of 1971) provides the court on appeal ne......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT