State v. Banks

Decision Date02 May 1934
Docket NumberNo. 123.,123.
Citation174 S.E. 306,206 N. C. 479
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court
PartiesSTATE . v. BANKS.

Appeal from Superior Court, McDowell County; Schenck, Judge.

J. E. Banks was convicted of utterance of check without sufficient funds to cover it, and he appeals.

Error.

A warrant was issued for the defendant by a justice of the peace, charging that on or about February 15, 1932, "J. E. Banks did unlawfully, willfully and feloniously issue and utter a worthless check for the amount of $26.34, drawn on the First National Bank of Marion, N. C, in favor of Eastern Oil & Gas Company. He, J. E. Banks, knowing at the time of issuing and uttering said check that he had not sufficient funds in said bank to cover same, contrary to the form of statute and against the peace and dignity of the State." The defendant was convicted in the recorder's court and appealed to the superior court. A jury trial was waived in accordance with chapter 23 of the Public Laws of 1933. The evidence for the state tended to show that the check was signed "Lake City Coal & Motor Company of Maryland by J. E. Banks." The witness said: "I never sold J.

E. Banks a gallon of oil and gas or anything while he was out there. It was to the Lake City Motor Company. * * * I never received a check from J. E. Banks personally for any of the gas I ever delivered. It was on the Lake City Motor Company, a check just like that one." The evidence discloses that the Lake City Coal & Motor Company was a corporation.

There was evidence that the check had been presented to the bank upon which it was drawn and payment declined on the ground of insufficient funds.

At the conclusion of evidence for the state the defendant moved for judgment of nonsuit and not guilty. The motion was denied, and the trial judge upon the facts aforesaid, being of the opinion that the defendant was guilty, so adjudged, and sentenced the defendant to jail for a term of thirty days to be worked upon the roads. Whereupon the defendant appealed.

G. D. Bailey and Charles Hutchins, both of Burnsville, for appellant.

Dennis G. Brummitt, Atty. Gen., and A. A.

F. Seawell, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

BROGDEN, Justice.

The motion for a verdict of not guilty made by the defendant should have been granted. This court, in State v. Edwards, 190 N. C. 322, 130 S. E. 10, says: "It will readily be seen, therefore, that the indictment must charge both 'insufficient funds' and 'insufficient credits, ' for, though the funds on deposit may be...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • State v. Morgan
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • 22 Mayo 1946
    ...is an essential of jurisdiction. State v. Beasley, 208 N.C. 318, 180 S.E. 598; State v. Rawls, 203 N.C. 436, 166 S.E. 332; State v. Banks, 206 N.C. 479, 174 S.E. 306. where no crime is charged in the warrant or bill of indictment upon which the defendant has been tried and convicted the jud......
  • State v. Camby, 292.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • 11 Diciembre 1935
    ...can this be done by act of assembly. State v. Pulliam, supra; State v. Beasley, 196 N.C. 797, 147 S.E. 301. The decision in State v. Banks, 206 N.C. 479, 174 S.E. 306, is not at variance with what is said above. Let the judgment be stricken out and the cause remanded for trial according to ......
  • Mcneeley v. Anderson
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • 2 Mayo 1934
    ... ... Bar Ass'n.ADAMS, Justice.It is not improbable that the judgment of the trial court was influenced, if not governed, by the decision in State v. Baldwin, 205 N. C. 174, 170 S. E. 645. The Baldwin Case was heard and determined in the superior court by the learned judge from whom the appeal ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT