State v. Barutio

Decision Date21 February 1899
Citation49 S.W. 1004,148 Mo. 249
PartiesSTATE v. BARUTIO.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

Appeal from St. Louis circuit court; P. R. Flitcraft, Judge.

Frank Barutio was convicted of murder, and appeals. Affirmed.

Chas. P. Johnson, W. F. Fitzgerald, and Chas. T. Noland, for appellant. Edward C. Crow, Atty. Gen., and Sam B. Jeffries, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

SHERWOOD, J.

Convicted of murder in the second degree, and his punishment assessed at 10 years in the penitentiary, and this under an indictment for murder in the first degree, defendant appeals to this court. Henry Becker, whose nick or pet name was "Hense," was the victim of the fatal shot fired by defendant. On this last-cited fact there is no dispute, nor is there any plea of self-defense in the case, nor any evidence to sustain such plea; so that the sole question presented to the lower court to try was the grade of homicide of which defendant should be found guilty.

The circumstances attendant on the homicide were, in substance, these: The defendant lived in the city of St. Louis, on Gyer avenue, between Third and Fourth streets. Henry Becker lived with his mother and brother on Gyer avenue, across the alley from defendant's home. On the 17th day of August, 1896, Henry Becker, Peter Opperman, Oscar Kuring, Paul Marty, Otto Wagner, George Humelson, and Johnnie Becker were sitting in the alley which passed between the premises of the defendant and the home of deceased's mother. This was between 7 and 8 o'clock in the evening. They had been sitting there about 15 minutes, engaged in conversation about hauling coke. Peter Opperman had just made the remark that he could unload a car of coke in a day, when the defendant came through the alley from his stable near by, and said to Opperman, "You've got a big mouth about work." To this Opperman replied, "I have when I get paid for it." Defendant then stepped up to Henry Becker, to whom he had not spoken for two years, and said to him, "Do I owe you anything?" when the latter replied, "Not a cent." The defendant then asked, "Who do I owe anything to?" and Becker answered, "Oscar Kuring you owe half a day." The defendant thereupon started towards Henry Becker, striking him on the head while he was sitting down; and he thereupon got up, and stood for a few minutes guarding himself against the blows of the defendant. He finally knocked defendant down, who fell between a team of horses which belonged to the defendant, and which were tied to a wagon near by. The defendant's sister-in-law came upon the scene of action, and assisted him in getting up, and, as he was going towards his house, he passed Henry Becker, and said, "I will fix him anyhow!" Henry Becker stood on the sidewalk for about 10 minutes; but meanwhile defendant, having gone down to his house, some 80 feet distant, got his revolver, and coming through his stable, which sat upon an alley, he advanced up the alley towards the scene of the recent fight, where the parties were still in the alley, and close to the house where Henry Becker's mother lived. Mrs. Becker, aware that there had been a bout between her son Henry and defendant, and hearing defendant come cursing up the alley, and saying that he was "going to kill the black son of a b____," called Henry, who, but a few feet away, came at his mother's call, entered the house, and slammed the door after him. Meanwhile defendant came on up the alley to where Pete Opperman was sitting, in a chair leaning up against Mrs. Becker's house, and, thrusting his revolver into Opperman's face, said, "Where is that black son of a b____?" This question defendant repeated for three or four minutes. Opperman made no reply. It was then about 7:30 o'clock, and a lamp had been lit in the front room, but had been moved into an adjoining room, and, the door being open, the light shone through into the front room. The window in that room was raised, and the shutters closed, but a slat had broken...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • State v. Feeley
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • January 31, 1906
    ...overruled as to what it takes to constitute manslaughter in the third degree (State v. Pettit, 119 Mo. 410, 24 S. W. 1014; State v. Barutio, 148 Mo. 249, 49 S. W. 1004), its correctness in all other respects has never been questioned by this court. In a homicidal case, it is only when there......
  • The State v. Vinso
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • February 3, 1903
    ...passion was not suddenly aroused. The court did not err in failing to instruct on manslaughter. State v. Crawford, 115 Mo. 620; State v. Barutio, 148 Mo. 249; State Kloss, 117 Mo. 591; State v. Lewis, 118 Mo. 79; State v. Swannagun, 109 Mo. 233. The instructions fully covered the case, and ......
  • The State v. Barutio
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • February 21, 1899
  • The State v. McKenzie
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • May 26, 1910
    ... ... manslaughter in the third degree, under our statute, when the ... killing is intentional; and the defendant's own ... testimony, if it establishes anything, shows that he ... intentionally shot and killed the deceased. [ State v ... Pettit, 119 Mo. 410, 24 S.W. 1014; State v ... Barutio, 148 Mo. 249, 49 S.W. 1004; State v ... Goldsby, 215 Mo. 48, 114 S.W. 500.] The facts of this ... case abundantly distinguish it from those in State v ... Elliott, 98 Mo. 150, 11 S.W. 566 ...           [228 ... Mo. 402] As to manslaughter in the fourth degree the ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT