State v. Bauberger, 172A06.

Decision Date15 December 2006
Docket NumberNo. 172A06.,172A06.
Citation637 S.E.2d 536
PartiesSTATE of North Carolina v. William Thomas BAUBERGER.
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court

Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Isaac T. Avery, III, Special Counsel, for the State.

Kathryn L. VandenBerg, Hillsborough, for defendant-appellant.

PER CURIAM.

Justice WAINWRIGHT took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See State v. Harrison, 360 N.C. 394, 627 S.E.2d 461 (2006); Crawford v. Commercial Union Midwest Ins. Co., 356 N.C. 609, 572 S.E.2d 781 (2002); Robinson v. Byrd, 356 N.C. 608, 572 S.E.2d 781 (2002).

AFFIRMED.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • State v. Morgan
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • 16 d5 Agosto d5 2019
  • State Of North Carolina v. Patino
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • 5 d2 Outubro d2 2010
    ...at 765-66. “In general, a trial court may not receive juror testimony to impeach a verdict already rendered.” State v. Bauberger, 176 N.C.App. 465, 469, 626 S.E.2d 700, 703, affirmed, 361 N.C. 105, 637 S.E.2d 536 (2006). Such inquiries are strictly limited under our General Statutes:(c) Aft......
  • Van Reypen Associates, Inc. v. Teeter, 84PA06.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • 15 d5 Dezembro d5 2006

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT