State v. Berry
| Decision Date | 24 February 1891 |
| Parties | The State v. Berry, Appellant |
| Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
October, 1890
Appeal from Greene Criminal Court. -- Hon. M. Oliver, Judge.
Affirmed.
T. W. Kersey, Almus Harrington and George Pepperdine for appellant.
John M. Wood, Attorney General, for the State.
The record shows that the bill of exceptions was not filed "during the term of the court," but in vacation, and there is no order entered of record allowing time to defendant to file such bill; it was, therefore, not filed in time and cannot be considered. R. S. 1889, sec. 2168; State v. Hill, 98 Mo. 570.
Defendant was tried in the criminal court of Greene county on change of venue from Taney county, for a felonious assault, and was by a jury found guilty and sentenced to imprisonment in the penitentiary for a term of five years. He has appealed to this court, and urges various alleged errors for which the judgment of the trial court should be reversed. The errors alleged, however, appear only in what purports to be a bill of exceptions filed in vacation of the court, and the record nowhere shows that the time to file this bill of exceptions was extended by the order of the court or that it was filed by the order of the court, and no error of the record proper being assigned and none being found, upon the authority of the cases of State v. Hill, 98 Mo. 570, 12 S.W. 340, and State v. Broderick, 59 Mo. 318, the judgment is affirmed. All of division number 2 concur.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Gratiot v. The Missouri Pacific Railway Company
... ... 1887), 12; ... Brown v. Railroad, 22 Minn. 165; Railroad v ... Mali, 25 American and English Railroad Cases (Md. 1886), ... 628; State v. Railroad 58 Md. 428; Hixson v ... Railroad, 80 Mo. 382; Zimmerman v. Railroad, 71 ... Mo. 476; Turner v. Railroad, 74 Mo. 603; Kelly ... division of this court, with reference to extending time for ... bills of exceptions in the circuit court, in State v ... Berry (1890), 103 Mo. 367, 15 S.W. 621, following older ... cases, and the same ... [21 S.W. 1100] ... principle governs the case before us ... ...
-
Musick v. The Kansas City, Springfield & Memphis Railroad Company
...Mo. 584; State v. Seaton, 106 Mo. 198; State v. Mosely, 116 Mo. 545; State v. Apperson, 115 Mo. 470; State v. Harben, 105 Mo. 603; State v. Berry, 103 Mo. 367; State Hill, 98 Mo. 570; State v. Scott, 113 Mo. 559; Mentzing v. Railroad, 64 Mo. 25. (2) If it were competent for this court on th......
-
Fulkerson v. Murdock
... ... exceptions after that time. In this position we are supported ... by the following cases: State v. Mosley, 116 Mo ... 546; State v. Scott, 109 Mo. 226; State v ... Hill, 98 Mo. 570; State v. Broderick, 70 Mo ... 622; Boardman v. Vaughn, 44 Mo.App. 549; McHoney ... v. Insurance Co., 44 Mo.App. 426; State v ... Apperson, 115 Mo. 470; State v. Berry, 103 Mo ... 367; State v. Harben, 105 Mo. 603; State v ... Seaton, 106 Mo. 208; State v. Ryan, 120 Mo. 88; ... State v. Mansfield, 106 Mo. 110; ... ...
-
The State v. Schuchmann
... ... 584; State v ... Mosley, 116 Mo. 546; State v. Scott, 109 Mo ... 226; State v. Hill, 98 Mo. 570; State v ... Broderick, 70 Mo. 622; Boardman v. Vaughn, 44 ... Mo.App. 549; McHoney v. Insurance Co., 44 Mo.App ... 426; State v. Apperson, 115 Mo. 470; State v ... Berry, 103 Mo. 367; State v. Harben, 105 Mo ... 603; State v. Seaton, 106 Mo. 208; State v ... Ryan, 120 Mo. 88; State v. Mansfield, 106 Mo ... 110; State v. Sweeney, 54 Mo.App. 580; R. S. 1889, sec. 2168 ... Division ... Two: Sherwood, J. Burgess, J., concurs. Gantt, ... ...