State v. Billings

Decision Date14 October 1890
Citation46 N.W. 862,81 Iowa 99
PartiesTHE STATE OF IOWA, Appellee, v. MYRON E. BILLINGS, Appellant
CourtIowa Supreme Court

Appeal from Black Hawk District Court.--HON. JOHN J. NEY, Judge.

THE defendant was indicted for the murder of Willis S. Kingsley on the twenty-first day of December, 1887, in Bremer county. The indictment was tried in Bremer county in 1888, and a verdict was returned of murder of the second degree, and from the judgment thereon, of life imprisonment, the defendant appealed, and the judgment was reversed, and a new trial ordered. The venue of the case was changed to Black Hawk county, where the case was again tried, with a like verdict and judgment, and the defendant again appeals.

REVERSED.

W. L Eaton and C. Wellington, with M. E. Billings, pro se, for appellant.

John Y Stone, Attorney General, C. W. Mullan, County Attorney, and E. A. Dawson, for the State.

OPINION

GRANGER, J.

I.

Willis S. Kingsley was, on the twenty-first of December, 1887, an attorney at law, and county attorney for Bremer county. His office was in the city of Waverly, on the north side of Bremer avenue. It consisted of two rooms, being a front and rear room, connected by folding doors. These rooms were on a second floor, with a door leading from each to a hall and stairway. On the same floor, in the rear of the office, were two rooms occupied by Dr. C. P. Byers. About six o'clock on the evening of December 21, 1887, Kingsley was found in a dying condition on the floor of his office, lying just inside the rear room, with his head against one of the folding doors, partly opened, and in such manner that his head was pressed forward till his chin was rested on his breast. When found he was alive, but unconscious, and died in a few moments, and without regaining consciousness. Soon after being discovered, the body was so moved lengthwise as to avoid the cramped position, and allow the head to rest on a cushion on the floor. The right arm lay along the right side on the floor, somewhat bent, so that the hand was near the hip, the fingers being also slightly bent. Between the hand and the hip, with the barrel somewhat under the hip or thigh, lay a revolver, from which two shots had been fired one of which caused the death of Kingsley. The ball had entered the head of Kingsley near the junction of the right nasal and frontal bones, at a point spoken of as the "inner angle of the right eye." On a chair in the front room of the office lay the overcoat of the defendant, in one pocket of which was an unloaded revolver, which had not been discharged on that occasion. But two shots had been fired, and both from the revolver lying by the side of Kingsley, and there were about four and one-half seconds of time between the two shots. Immediately after the shots were fired, the defendant came from the stairway leading to Kingsley's office, with the remark: "I'm shot, and I have the papers to show why. I am shot. Kingsley has shot me, and I want some one to help me." An examination disclosed a hole through the back of the coat, vest, shirt and undershirt of the defendant, and that the ring connecting the lower and upper parts of the suspenders was broken, the suspenders separated, and a revolver ball, somewhat flattened, was impressed upon and adhered to the suspender ring. Directly over the spinous process, and about on a line with the lower ends of the shoulder blades, was a slight wound about the "size of a three-cent piece," and slightly swollen.

It may here be stated that the testimony as to the killing is entirely circumstantial. No living person, barring the defendant, has positive knowledge of the facts. For some time just prior to the killing the defendant was in the office of Kingsley, and Dr. C. P. Byers, who was in the adjoining office, heard loud words, and, stepping to his door, overheard some parts of an altercation, and his is the only testimony of a third person of what occurred at that time between defendant and Kingsley. The following is a part of his testimony: "The first words I heard of the conversation was an order to 'Get out of my office.' That order was made by Kingsley. These are the words I heard: 'I want you to get out of my office.' Don't think I heard any reply to that order. I went to the door and opened it partially, and stood there. Then I heard that order repeated. Heard it repeated a good many times. Heard Billings reply in answer like this: 'That he wasn't going out.' I think he said: 'I am not going out.' Then I heard a movement in Kingsley's office. Think Billings said he came to have a talk. Think Kingsley repeated the order to 'Go out,' but Billings said he would not go out; that he had come to have a talk. Heard Kingsley say next: 'You darned old stinker, you have been trying to work up a scheme on me, and I want you to get out.' Don't think I heard any reply to that. I think Kingsley repeated that order. I think after that the door opened suddenly, and closed with a bang. Think it was Kingsley's door to front office. I then heard Billings open the conversation with something about his wife. That was all I understood of that. Then he said something about some 'beastly act.' In reply to that I think Kingsley said: 'Do you mean to accuse me of that, or say that I did that?' And Billings said: 'I said nothing of that kind.' I understood no more of the conversation. I heard the sound of voices going on in a conversation, but couldn't understand it. That continued quite a while. I heard Billings say that, 'When I returned, it was with the intention of blowing your brains out, but something prevented me, or changed my mind.' Did not hear Kingsley make any reply to this. Do not remember hearing any further conversation that I could understand. This conversation went on quite a while after that. After that I heard two sharp reports. They sounded like pistol shots. Thin I stood at my door with it partially opened when I heard the first shot. Think my door was open more than a foot. I could see straight ahead, out of my door into the hall. The door latched on the north side, and swung in the room to the south. Think I was standing at the door, with my hand on the knob, with the door open about a foot, when I heard the first pistol shot. It sounded in the front part of the building. I can't recollect whether I heard the door of Kingsley's office open at any time after the time I heard it open and close with a bang. I did not see any flash or light of a pistol shot in the hall. I heard another pistol shot following that one. Think I heard the second shot about four seconds after the first shot." The witness now here claps his hands together four times. The reporter times witness while he claps his hands four times. By the reporter: "I got it four and one-half seconds." It is stipulated by the attorneys for the defendant, and also for the state, that the reporter found the time to be four and a half seconds. Witness: "Think I was standing in the same place at the time I heard the second pistol shot as I was when I heard the first shot. I was standing inside of the door, looking into the hall. I don't remember of hearing any door in Kingsley's or in that building open and close between the time of the first pistol shot and the second pistol shot. At the time that I heard the second pistol shot I did not see any flash or light of a pistol shot either in the hall or upon the stairway. I have no recollection now of hearing anyone come out of Kingsley's office and step up on the hall or go down the stairs before the time that I heard the second pistol shot. Following the second pistol shot, I heard the falling of a body. It sounded as though a very heavy body fell upon the floor. This occurred immediately after I heard the second pistol shot."

The defendant had contemplated, or at least prepared, some papers, looking to a criminal prosecution of Kingsley for the seduction of one Emily Shane, and he either believed, or professed to believe, that there had been criminal intimacy between his wife and Kingsley; and defendant's mission to the office of Kingsley on the night in question was with reference to one or both of these matters.

On the person of defendant, when he came from the office of Kingsley, was an envelope containing papers, which we need only briefly describe. Exhibit 13 is in the handwriting of the defendant, and is as follows:

"WAVERLY, IOWA, 1887.

"M. E. Billings, Attorney:

"I herewith deliver to you my notes as follows: Three hundred and sixty dollars due in equal monthly installments in 1888; two hundred and forty dollars due in equal monthly installments in 1889. Fourteen notes, for twenty dollars each, due in equal monthly installments or one each year from 1890 to 1903, inclusive. Also a chattel and real-estate mortgage to secure the same. Also an assignment of same amounts per month, as in notes of my salary as county attorney, to further secure the same. Said notes being for damages occasioned by my seducing and debauching the lady who was of irreproachable character."

This paper was without signature, and there were also notes, a real-estate and a chattel mortgage, unsigned, with dates for payments, and amounts to correspond with the assignment (Exhibit 13); also an information charging Kingsley with the crime of adultery with defendant's wife, with the name of Delia E. Billings as informant, and sworn to before M. E Billings as notary public. This was in the handwriting of defendant, and the name of his wife affixed thereto without authority; also an information charging Kingsley with the crime of seduction, with Emily Shane as informant, and sworn to before M. E. Billings; the information, except signature, being in his handwriting. On the back thereof was the...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT