State v. Black, 2013-1076

Decision Date06 November 2013
Docket NumberNO. 2013-1076,2013-1076
Citation136 Ohio St.3d 1558,996 N.E.2d 985
PartiesState v. Black
CourtOhio Supreme Court
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

Ross App. No. 12CA3327, 2013-Ohio-2105.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • State v. Fouts
    • United States
    • Ohio Court of Appeals
    • March 16, 2016
    ... ... Failure to object constitutes forfeiture of any challenges on appeal except for plain error. State v ... Black , 4th Dist. Ross No. 12CA3327, 2013-Ohio-2105, 20-21 appeal not allowed, 136 Ohio St.3d 1558, 2013-Ohio-4861, 996 N.E.2d 985, 20-21 (2013); State ... ...
  • Black v. Tibbals
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Ohio
    • November 24, 2015
    ...case to the trial court. Id. On November 6, 2013, the Ohio Supreme Court declined to accept jurisdiction of the appeal. State v. Black, 136 Ohio St.3d 1558 (Ohio 2013). On April 14, 2014, the state court re-sentenced Petitioner toan aggregate term of twelve years' incarceration plus five ye......
  • State v. Walters
    • United States
    • Ohio Court of Appeals
    • September 7, 2016
    ... ... By not raising this objection below, Walters forfeited all but plain error. State v ... Black , 4th Dist. Ross No. 12CA3327, 2013-Ohio-2105, 20-21 appeal not allowed, 136 Ohio St.3d 1558, 2013-Ohio-4861, 996 N.E.2d 985, 20-21 (2013); State ... ...
  • State v. Black
    • United States
    • Ohio Court of Appeals
    • May 23, 2016

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT