State v. Blake
| Decision Date | 30 January 2020 |
| Docket Number | No. 96873-0,96873-0 |
| Citation | 194 Wash.2d 1023,456 P.3d 395 (Table) |
| Court | Washington Supreme Court |
| Parties | STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. Shannon B. BLAKE, Petitioner. |
ORDER
For the Court
CHIEF JUSTICE
¶ 1 This case came before the Court on its January 30, 2020, En Banc Conference to consider the petition for review. A majority of the Court voted in favor of the following result:
¶ 4 That the petition for review is granted. Any party may serve and file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of this order, see RAP 13.7(d).
/s/ Stephens, C.J.
To continue reading
Request your trial
7 cases
-
State v. Blake
...Wash.2d at 380, 635 P.2d 435 ; State v. Schmeling , 191 Wash. App. 795, 365 P.3d 202 (2015) ).¶ 10 We granted review. State v. Blake , 194 Wash.2d 1023, 456 P.3d 395 (2020). ANALYSIS I. THE STRICT LIABILITY DRUG POSSESSION STATUTE EXCEEDS THE STATE ’ S POLICE POWER BY IMPOSING HARSH FELONY ......
-
State v. Smalley
...Bradshaw during the pendency of this appeal, that holding would apply to this case. However, the court has not yet issued an opinion in Blake. Therefore, we remain bound Bradshaw. State v. Jussila, 197 Wn.App. 908, 931, 392 P.3d 1108 (2017). We reject Smalley's argument that the information......
-
State v. Banks
...a case that may address this issue. State v. Blake, 194 Wn.2d 1023, 456 P.3d 395 (2020). However, the court has not yet issued an opinion in Blake. --------- ...
-
State v. Smalley
...Id. at 535-37. Bradshaw remains good law. Smalley notes that the Supreme Court has granted review on this issue in State v. Blake, 194 Wn.2d 1023, 456 P.3d 395 (2020). And he argues that if the Supreme Court were to overrule Bradshaw during the pendency of this appeal, that holding would ap......
Request a trial to view additional results