State v. Booker, ED 69048

Decision Date23 November 1999
Docket NumberNo. ED 69048,ED 73059.,ED 69048
PartiesSTATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Dennis BOOKER, Appellant. Dennis Booker, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

Dave Hemingway, Asst. Sp. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Daniel W. Follett, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before JAMES R. DOWD, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, J.

Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied October 5, 1999.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the judgment entered upon his conviction by a jury of second degree murder, first degree assault and two counts of armed criminal action, for which he was sentenced to two life terms and two twenty-five year terms in the custody of the Department of Corrections, all to be served consecutively. Defendant also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. The trial court's judgment on the Rule 29.15 motion is based on findings of fact and conclusions of law that are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would be of no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties with a brief memorandum opinion, for their use only, explaining the reasons for our decision.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Chandler v. Hemeyer
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • July 17, 2001
    ... ... Timothy L. Chander, Appellant ... John C. Hemeyer, Sheriff of Cole County, Missouri, State of Missouri, Division of Liquor Control, Respondent/Defendant ... Missouri Court of Appeals ... ...
1 books & journal articles
  • Other Workplace Torts
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Archive Texas Employment Law. Volume 2 - 2017 Part VI. Workplace Torts
    • August 19, 2017
    ...injuries. Proximate cause requires “cause-in-fact” and “foreseeability.” Excel Corp. v. Apodaca , 81 30-9 Oඍඁൾඋ Wඈඋ඄ඉඅൺർൾ Tඈඋඍඌ §30:3 S.W.3d 817, 820 (Tex. 2002); Doe v. Boys Clubs of Greater Dallas, Inc. , 868 S.W.2d 942, 952 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 1994, writ granted), aff’d , 907 S.W.2d 472 ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT