State v. Booth
Decision Date | 31 May 1916 |
Docket Number | No. 19326.,19326. |
Citation | 186 S.W. 1019 |
Parties | STATE v. BOOTH. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Boone County; David H. Harris, Judge.
John N. Booth was convicted of obtaining money under false pretenses and representations, and he appeals. Judgment reversed, and cause remanded.
Defendant was convicted of obtaining money under false pretenses and representations, and sentenced to two years in the penitentiary. The information, omitting formal parts, is as follows:
The defendant is about 42 years old, was reared in Saline county, educated at the State University, practiced law at least nominally in several counties in the state and in St. Louis, lived for short intervals in several different states, and was twice married. Notwithstanding the fact that he was without financial means, in the summer of 1914 he went to Columbia and promoted the organization of a corporation named the "Columbia Guarantee Abstract Company." He sold stock in the company, employed stenographers and clerks, rented offices, built a concrete vault, bought stationery, adding machines, etc. About November 23, 1914, Mr. Ira T. G. Stone, cashier of the Central Bank of Columbia, called on defendant and solicited his patronage as a customer of that bank.
It is sufficient to say that the evidence shows the making of the pretenses and representations as charged; that the draft mentioned was presented to the bank by Miss Blanton, as employé of defendant; that the amount of the draft was deposited to the account of defendant in the bank subject to check; that all the money so deposited, except the $17.03, was paid out on checks drawn by defendant within two days thereafter; that the draft was purchased and the money so deposited to the credit of defendant on the faith of such pretenses and representations; that the draft was dishonored and protested, the bank receiving notice thereof after the payment of the checks above mentioned; that all said pretenses and representations...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
The State v. Rosenheim
...said sum had been obtained in the form of a check. [State v. Bowman, 247 S.W. l. c. 145; State v. Chick, 282 Mo. 51, 221 S.W. 10; State v. Booth, 186 S.W. 1019; State Foley, 247 Mo. l. c. 633; State v. Salmon, 216 Mo. 466, 115 S. W. 1106; State v. Terry, 109 Mo. 601, 19 S.W. 206.] The above......
-
State v. Munroe
...and the crediting of the depositor's account with the amount thereof, is equivalent to the receipt of said amount of money. State v. Booth, 186 S.W. 1019; State v. Salmon, 216 Mo. 520; Burton v. States, 196 U.S. 302; Ellis v. State, 138 Wis. 513. (2) The court did not err in overruling defe......
-
State v. Rosenheim
...in the form of a check. State v. Bowman (Mo. Sup.) 247 S. W. loc. cit. 145; State v. Chick, 282 Mo. 51, 221 S. W. 10; State v. Booth (Mo. Sup.) 186 S. W. 1019; State v. Foley, 247 Mo. loc. cit. 633, 153 S. W. 1010; State v. Salmon, 216 Mo. 466, 115 W. 1106; State v. Terry, 109 Mo. 601, 19 S......
-
The State v. Lively
... ... examiners. Such evidence is admissible in this kind of a ... case. State v. Salmon, 216 Mo. 529. (6) No error was ... committed by the court overruling the defendant's ... demurrer. There was no fatal variance in the proof. State ... v. Sattley, 131 Mo. 464; State v. Booth, 186 ... S.W. 1019; State v. Salmon, 216 Mo. 466; R. S. 1919, scec ... Railey, ... C. Higbee, C. , concurs ... ... OPINION ... RAILEY ... [279 S.W. 77] ... [311 ... Mo. 423] On February 4, 1924, the ... ...