State v. Bowman
Decision Date | 09 December 1922 |
Docket Number | No. 23663.,23663. |
Parties | BOWMAN v. BOWMAN. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Jasper County; Grant Emerson, Judge.
John A. Bowman was convicted of obtaining money by false pretenses, and he appeals. Reversed and remanded.
A. W. Thurman and Paul G. Koontz, both of Joplin, for appellant.
Jesse W. Barrett, Atty. Gen., and J. Henry Caruthers, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
Statement.
Convicted of obtaining money by false pretenses, defendant appeals. His punishment was assessed by the jury at two years in the penitentiary.
The evidence was to the effect that appellant, Olive J. Nelson, and Dr. C. V. Thorne, in the summer of 1910, conceived the idea of engaging in mining enterprises in Venezuela, South America. Appellant had been in South America on various enterprises and had acquired some Information about mineral deposits there.
Thorne, who had but a short time previously returned from the war, desired to go to South America, and, having been informed that appellant had been there, consulted with him relative to mining opportunities. The result of such an interview was that an association was formed between appellant, Thorne, and Nelson, under an instrument variously referred to as a "declaration of trust" and "common-law trust," under the name the Pan-American Development Company, wherein provision was made for the issuance of 100,000 shares of common stock of the par value of $1, and a tentative or additional provision for the further issuance of $100,000 of stock to be classified as "preferred shares" or "part preferred and the balance common shares."
It was provided that "the trustee shall hold the legal title to all property at any time belonging to this trust, and shall have and exercise the exclusive management and control of the same," etc. It was the apparent purpose of said "declaration of trust" to clothe the trustee with the same powers as may be found ordinarily vested in a board of directors of a regularly formed corporation.
Due provisions were made for officers of the association or company, and Thorne was made president and Nelson secretary. Apparently no progress was made by the company or association until some time in September, when Thorne, then a practising dentist at Joplin, had an interview with the prosecuting witness, who is an Osage Indian, and who had acquired some ready money upon the sale of his oil properties in Oklahoma. The prosecuting witness was a patient of Thorne's and through him became interested in the proposition, and particularly with respect to the mining opportunities in South America. It was arranged that Rogers should meet with the members of the association and learn from appellant about mining prospects in Venezuela. Such a meeting was held, and Rogers testified that very attractive representations were made by appellant, and assurances given that, with the proper developments of certain leases and concessions then owned by the association, large returns could be immediately realized, and stockholders might reasonably expect large dividends within 60 days. This appealed to the speculative instinct of Rogers, and for his large investment, that Rogers should be made a vice president of the company and as such exercise the powers of the president in the absence of that official. Thorne was then president of the association or company.
On the 15th of September Rogers went to the First National Bank of Joplin with Nelson, the secretary, and there delivered to him a check for $10.000 signed by Rogers' wife, payable to Rogers, but regularly indorsed by him. In his presence this check was deposited by Nelson to the credit of the Pan-American Development Company. It was a new account in the bank and Nelson, as secretary, filed his signature. It was the arrangement that all checks upon funds of the company should be signed by the secretary and countersigned by the president or acting president. Certificates of stock were delivered to Rogers at the same time, and he concurrently became vice president.
It was further arranged that Rogers, Nelson, Thorne, and appellant should all have salaries, and Nelson and Rogers immediately arranged for the opening of offices "for the company. It was planned that appellant, the trustee, and Thorne, the president, should go to Venezuela and there undertake the development of mines. No `money could be drawn from the account of the said company, except upon check signed by the secretary and countersigned by Thorne, or, in his absence, by Rogers. In consummation of the arrangement for appellant and Thorne to go to Venezuela, a check was drawn for $500, upon which Nelson obtained the cash and delivered same to appellant. At the same time another check for $7,500 signed by Nelson and Thorne was drawn payable to the First National Bank and with that a...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Golden
...240 Mo. 269, 144 S.W. 836; State v. Scovill, 15 S.W. 931; State v. Stewart, 63 S.W.2d l.c. 213; State v. Meek, 70 Mo. l.c. 358; State v. Bowman, 247 S.W. 143; State Craft, 23 S.W.2d 183; State ex rel. Hickey v. McGrath, 95 Mo. 193, 6 S.W. 425; State ex inf. Williamson v. Black, 145 S.W.2d 4......
-
State v. Golden
...Mo. 269, 144 S.W. 836; State v. Scovill, 15 S.W. 931; State v. Stewart, 63 S.W. (2d) l.c. 213; State v. Meek, 70 Mo. l.c. 358; State v. Bowman, 247 S.W. 143; State v. Craft, 23 S.W. (2d) 183; State ex rel. Hickey v. McGrath, 95 Mo. 193, 6 S.W. 425; State ex inf. Williamson v. Black, 145 S.W......
-
State v. Gabriel
... ... case and prejudical to the defense of the defendant." In ... this case the trial court did not so find. The question we ... are now discussing was not called to the court's ... attention. Said statute would not excuse a total failure of ... proof of the crime charged (State v. Bowman (Mo.), ... 247 S.W. 143), but in this case we think there was no such ... failure. The Indiana case cited is authority against rather ... than for the defendant. We rule this point against the ... defendant ... Point ... is made that the court erred in permitting Dr ... ...
-
State v. Adams
... ... (2) ... The court erred in overruling the defendant's motion for ... a directed verdict, in the nature of a demurrer to the ... evidence, offered at the close of the entire case. State ... v. Davis, 315 Mo. 1285, 292 S.W. 430; 7 C.J. 549, sec ... 160; 7 C.J. 547. sec. 155; State v. Bowman, 247 S.W ... 143. (3) The court erred in giving and reading Instruction 2, ... since said instruction was erroneous in the following ... particulars: Because the state failed to prove that defendant ... and Meesey acted together with a common intent for the ... purpose of embezzling funds ... ...