State v. Boyd
| Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
| Writing for the Court | Bland |
| Citation | State v. Boyd, 108 Mo. App. 518, 84 S.W. 191 (Mo. App. 1904) |
| Decision Date | 12 April 1904 |
| Parties | STATE v. BOYD. |
Appeal from St. Louis Court of Criminal Correction; Hiram N. Moore, Judge.
Samuel J. Boyd was indicted for negligence in office as captain of police. A demurrer to the indictment was sustained, and the state appeals. Reversed, and certified to the Supreme Court.
C. P. Williams, for the State. T. J. Rowe, S. S. Bass, and F. W. Lehman, for respondent.
Omitting caption, the indictment is as follows: ...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
16 cases
-
Hanser v. Bieber
...police force, to "prevent crime and arrest offenders." This statute, as construed by the St. Louis Court of Appeals in State v. Boyd, 108 Mo. App. 518, 84 S. W. 191, and, impliedly approved in a review of that case by this court (196 Mo. loc. cit. 59, 94 S. W. 536), is held to authorize a p......
-
Palmer v. City of Liberal
...32 C. J., sec. 384, p. 242; Putnam v. Juvenile Shoe Co., 269 S.W. 593; Kerney v. Lair, 164 Mo.App. 406, 144 S.W. 904; State v. Boyd, 108 Mo.App. 518, 84 S.W. 191; Spelling on Injunction (2 Ed.), sec. 628; Boise Artesian Hot & Cold Water Co. v. City of Boise, supra. (3) The city was not requ......
-
Engelbrecht v. Roworth
...227 Mo.App. 297. (3) 5 C. J., p. 385, par. 1. (4) Wehmeyer v. Mulvihill, 150 Mo.App. 197; Kennedy v. Lear, 164 Mo.App. 406; State v. Boyd, 108 Mo.App. 518; State v. Grant, 76 Mo. 235; State Hancock, 73 Mo. 19. (5) Sec. 7543, R. S. Mo. 1929; Charter of the City of St. Louis; Cramer v. Harmon......
-
Hanser v. Bieber
...that the prisoner is ultimately acquitted, does not convert the arrest into an unlawful one. State v. Hancock, 73 Mo.App. 19; State v. Boyd, 108 Mo.App. 518, Mo. 52; Grayson v. Transit Co., 100 Mo.App. 73; Wehmeyer v. Mulvihill, 150 Mo.App. 197; State v. Grant, 76 Mo. 236. Nor can there be ......
Get Started for Free