State v. Britt

CourtMissouri Supreme Court
Writing for the CourtGantt
CitationState v. Britt, 23 S.W. 771, 117 Mo. 584 (Mo. 1893)
Decision Date09 November 1893
PartiesSTATE v. BRITT.

Appeal from circuit court, Montgomery county; E. M. Hughes, Judge.

Anderson Britt was convicted of defiling his ward, and he appeals. Affirmed.

Appling & Cole, for appellant. R. F. Walker, Atty. Gen., and Morton Jourdan, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

GANTT, C. J.

At the October term, 1890, in the circuit court of Montgomery county, the defendant was indicted and convicted of defiling his ward, one Mary Dow, a female under the age of 18 years. His motions for a new trial and in arrest were overruled, and he filed his affidavit for appeal, and it was granted. On November 1, 1890, the court made the following order: Ordered, "that the said defendant be allowed an appeal, with leave to defendant to file a bill of exceptions within forty days from this date." The defendant did not avail himself of this extension, and file his bill of exceptions in the 40 days; nor did he obtain from the circuit judge, during the 40 days, an extension of the time; nor did the attorneys on both sides enter into a written stipulation extending the time, and file it with the clerk, in the cause. But on the 26th of April, 1892, some 15 months after the leave given by the court had expired, this entry appears in the record: "Now, at this day, comes defendant herein, by his attorney, and files his bill of exceptions herein, all exceptions as to time of filing...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
17 cases
  • State ex rel. Priddy v. Gibson
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • March 16, 1905
    ... ... exception during the month of December, 1904. "Counsel ... cannot confer jurisdiction." Bank v. Barker, ... 145 Mo. 367; State ex rel. v. Gates, 143 Mo. 63; ... State v. Schuchmann, 133 Mo. 111; State v ... Simmons, 124 Mo. 443; State v. Britt, 117 Mo ... 584; State v. Moseley, 116 Mo. 545; State v ... Apperson, 115 Mo. 470; State v. Scott, 113 Mo ... 559. (2) The fact that the time given by the court to file ... bills of exceptions had expired before this action was begun ... is not sufficient to prevent the issuance of ... ...
  • Musick v. The Kansas City, Springfield & Memphis Railroad Company
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • November 12, 1894
    ...on him, and he could not shift it to the opposing counsel, so as to relieve himself of the consequences of his own neglect. State v. Britt, 117 Mo. 584, 23 S.W. 771. The of exceptions was not, therefore, filed in time, and alleged errors arising thereon can not be considered. II. The action......
  • The State v. Schuchmann
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • March 3, 1896
    ...of time had expired. The judgment should, therefore, be affirmed. State v. Simmons, 124 Mo. 443; State v. Clark, 119 Mo. 426; State v. Britt, 117 Mo. 584; State Mosley, 116 Mo. 546; State v. Scott, 109 Mo. 226; State v. Hill, 98 Mo. 570; State v. Broderick, 70 Mo. 622; Boardman v. Vaughn, 4......
  • Union National Bank of Chicago v. Barker
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • July 6, 1898
    ...proper, and the bill of exceptions not having been filed within the time, judgment must be affirmed. State v. Clark, 119 Mo. 426; State v. Britt, 117 Mo. 584; State Mosley, 116 Mo. 545; State v. Apperson, 115 Mo. 470; State v. Seaton, 106 Mo. 198. (2) The description of the indebtedness und......
  • Get Started for Free