State v. Britton
| Decision Date | 01 July 1926 |
| Docket Number | 19485. |
| Citation | 137 Wash. 360,247 P. 9 |
| Parties | STATE v. BRITTON. |
| Court | Washington Supreme Court |
Appeal from Superior Court, Lincoln County; Truax, Judge.
On rehearing. Former rehearing adhered to.
For former opinion, see 242 P. 377.
R. M. Dye, of Davenport (Turner, Nuzum & Nuzum and Edward M. Connelly, all of Spokane, of counsel), for appellant.
Roy Co. Fox and Joseph H. Johnston, both of Davenport, for the State.
Upon a rehearing en banc, a majority of the court adhere to the department opinion heretofore filed herein and reported in 242 P. 377.
The judgment and sentence are affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Much
...v. Beaupre, 149 Wash. 675, 272 P. 26; State v. Estes, 151 Wash. 51, 274 P. 1053. See, also, State v. Britton, 137 Wash. 360, 242 P. 377, 247 P. 9; v. Chiagles, 237 N.Y. 193, 142 N.E. 583, 32 A. L. R. 676, and notes thereto. The next contention of appellant is that the evidence in the record......
-
State v. Lindsey, 26824.
...accused and the admissibility of the evidence of such articles so found are beyond question. State v. Britton, 137 Wash. 360, 242 P. 377, 247 P. 9; v. March, 156 Wash. 403, 287 P. 57; State v. Thomas, 183 Wash. 643, 49 P.2d 28. Hence, there is no merit in that contention. The second assignm......
-
State v. Roberts
...under State v. Beeman, 51 Wash. 557, 99 P. 756; State v. Trombley, 132 Wash. 514, 232 P. 326; State v. Britton, 137 Wash. 360, 242 P. 377, 247 P. 9. But find very much in the circumstances shown tending to couple the appellant with crime beyond the mere possession of some of the property st......
-
State v. Thomas
...and the subsequent introduction of these articles in evidence at the trial was not error. State v. Britton, 137 Wash. 360, 242 P. 377, 247 P. 9. circumstances under which the police officers entered the room prior to the arrest of appellant and his codefendant are not very definitely set ou......