State v. Brown

Decision Date21 March 1876
Citation1 Mo.App. 449
PartiesTHE STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent, v. HENRY BROWN, Appellant.
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

An appeal cannot be taken from a judgment sentencing the defendant to death, where the sentence has been executed.

APPEAL from St. Louis Criminal Court.

Stricken from the docket.

Fauntleroy & Clark, for appellant, cited: State v. Perrine, 56 Mo. 602.

J. C. Normile, Circuit Attorney, for respondent.

GANTT, P. J., delivered the opinion of the court.

Henry Brown, having been regularly indicted, was tried and convicted of murder in the first degree, on September 8, 1875. He was sentenced to be hanged October 22, 1875, and was actually executed on that day.

At his trial a bill of exceptions was signed by the judge of the Criminal Court. It is to be inferred either that no attempt was made to obtain an order suspending the execution of the sentence, or that the court to which any application for that purpose was made was of opinion that there was nothing meritorious in the prayer. On this head the record is silent.

When the cause was called in this court on March 6, 1876, the circuit attorney suggested the death of the appellant, and the counsel who professed to represent him admitted that he had been executed pursuant to the sentence of the St. Louis Criminal Court.

Thereupon this court ordered the cause to be stricken from the docket, against the protest of the counsel who claimed to represent the deceased, who urged, with much earnestness, that the statutes of Missouri grant the right of appeal in “all cases of felony; that there was no exception when the felon had ceased to live, and that his right of appeal survived him.

We are of opinion that the counsel (whose zeal and earnestness in behalf of his client are very commendable) has omitted to consider the signification of the term employed by our law-makers. There is no case before the court respecting Henry Brown. We confine our remarks, of course, to the man who was hanged on October 22, 1875, and have no reference to any other person of that name who may be still alive, and, for aught we know, a party to a controversy in some suit, the record of which is lodged in this court in conformity with a writ of error or appeal under the constitution and laws of Missouri. But the case to which the Henry Brown who died on October 22, 1875, was a party is at an end. To every “case” there must be at least two parties. It is elementary that actor et reus are essential to every...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • State v. Standard Oil Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • December 23, 1908
    ...Berdalet, 4 Term. R. 402; In re Elsam, 3 Barn. & Cres. 597; Block v. Barton, 27 La. Ann. 89; York County v. Fewell, 21 S. C. 106; State v. Brown, 1 Mo. App. 449; State v. Railroad, 74 N. C. 287; Kidd v. Morrison, 62 N. C. 31; Dakota Company v. Glidden, 113 U. S. 222, 5 Sup. Ct. 428, 28 L. E......
  • The State ex inf. Hadley v. Standard Oil Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • March 9, 1909
    ... ... 91), or an exclusive right to furnish ... a commodity to a certain person ( Ferris v. Brewing ... Co., 155 Ind. 539, 58 N.E. 701; Catt v. Towle, L. R ... 4 Ch. 654), or appoint one an exclusive agent for his ... commodity ( Newell v. Meyendorff, 9 Mont. 254; ... Trap Rock Co. v. Brown, 61 N. J. L. 536; Fuller ... v. Hope, 163 Pa. St. 62). So one can, to hold or obtain ... business, give secret rebates. In the consideration of the ... questions of the legal right to give rebates and to make a ... territorial division, many other illustrations are given of ... instances ... ...
  • Baker v. Modern Woodmen of America
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • June 22, 1909
    ...of the very right of action itself. The right of prosecution is as effectually wiped out as if it had never existed. In State v. Brown, 1 Mo.App. 449, this court, l. c. treating of the effect of the death of one of the parties to the cause, pending an appeal, says: "When either ceases to ex......
  • Baker v. Modern Woodmen of America
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • June 22, 1909
    ...of the very right of action itself. The right of prosecution is as effectually wiped out as if it had never existed. In State v. Brown, 1 Mo. App. 449, loc. cit. 450, this court, treating of the effect of the death of one of the parties to the cause, pending an appeal, says: "When either ce......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT