State v. Brown
| Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | Sherwood, J. |
| Citation | State v. Brown, 115 Mo. 409, 22 S.W. 367 (Mo. 1893) |
| Decision Date | 02 May 1893 |
| Parties | STATE v. BROWN. |
Appeal from circuit court, Audrain county; E. M. Hughes, Judge.
Press Brown was convicted of larceny, and he appeals. Reversed.
The other facts fully appear in the following statement by SHERWOOD, J.:
The defendant was charged with having committed petit larceny the second time, after a prior conviction. The indictment, omitting caption, is the following: Tried under this indictment, the defendant was found guilty, his punishment assessed at two years' imprisonment in the penitentiary, and he appeals to this court. When the cause came on for trial the record recites that the state, to sustain the issues on its part, examined as a witness D. H. Harris, a justice of the peace within and for Audrain county, Mo., who testified as follows: The state, to prove a former conviction of the defendant before said D. H. Harris, J. P., introduced the following record of said D. H. Harris, J. P., in words and figures as follows, to wit: To the introduction of which defendant objected, but the court overruled said objection, and permitted said record read to the jury, to which ruling and action of the court the defendant excepted, and saved his exceptions at the time. The state also introduced in evidence the following commitment, in words as follows, to wit: ...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
State v. Whipkey
...from the penitentiary. R.S. 1939, sec. 4854; State v. Austin, 113 Mo. 538, 21 S.W. 31; State v. Brinkley, 193 S.W.2d 49; State v. Brown, 115 Mo. 409, 22 S.W. 367; v. Hamilton, 340 Mo. 768, 102 S.W.2d 642; State v. Krebs, 336 Mo. 516, 80 S.W.2d 196; State v. Sumpter, 335 Mo. 620, 73 S.W.2d 7......
-
Bickett v. Knight
... ... 333 BICKETT, Atty. Gen. v. KNIGHT. (No. 547.) Supreme Court of North Carolina. May 25, 1915. Clark, C. J., and Brown, J., dissenting. Appeal from Superior Court, Buncombe County, Webb, Judge. Action by the State, on the relation ... ...
-
State v. King
...of conviction of the St. Louis court of criminal correction, see State v. Bruckner, Mo.App., 272 S.W. 1061, 1062. State v. Brown, 1893, 115 Mo. 409, 415, 22 S.W. 367, 369(3), was a prosecution for the commission of a second petit larceny at a time when our habitual criminal act, RSMo 1889, ......
-
State v. Donnelly
...State v. Wieners, 66 Mo. 13. (3) The court should have instructed that the indictment constituted no evidence against defendant. State v. Brown, 115 Mo. 409; State Duncan, 116 Mo. 302. (4) The court erred in refusing to give instructions A, B, and F asked by defendant. (5) There was no evid......