State v. Brown

CourtMissouri Supreme Court
Writing for the CourtSherwood, J.
CitationState v. Brown, 115 Mo. 409, 22 S.W. 367 (Mo. 1893)
Decision Date02 May 1893
PartiesSTATE v. BROWN.

Appeal from circuit court, Audrain county; E. M. Hughes, Judge.

Press Brown was convicted of larceny, and he appeals. Reversed.

The other facts fully appear in the following statement by SHERWOOD, J.:

The defendant was charged with having committed petit larceny the second time, after a prior conviction. The indictment, omitting caption, is the following: "The grand jurors for the state of Missouri, summoned from the body of the county of Audrain, impaneled, charged, and sworn to inquire within and for said county and state, upon their oaths present and charge that one Press Brown, on the 14th day of June, 1890, before D. H. Harris, a justice of the peace for Audrain county, Missouri, was charged and convicted of the crime of petit larceny, and sentenced to 30 days' imprisonment in the county jail; that he, the said Press Brown, complied with the said sentence, and was discharged, and that thereafter, on or about the 25th day of June, A. D. 1892, at the county and state aforesaid, the said Press Brown did then and there, unlawfully and feloniously, one single barrel shotgun of the value of five dollars, the property of Lamartine Lockland, steal, take, and carry away, against the peace and dignity of the state. F. R. Jesse, Prosecuting Attorney." Tried under this indictment, the defendant was found guilty, his punishment assessed at two years' imprisonment in the penitentiary, and he appeals to this court. When the cause came on for trial the record recites that the state, to sustain the issues on its part, examined as a witness D. H. Harris, a justice of the peace within and for Audrain county, Mo., who testified as follows: "I know the defendant, Press Brown. He was tried before me on the 14th of June, 1890. This is my docket record, and it contains a full and complete record of the proceedings had in the case of State of Missouri vs. Press Brown, who is the defendant in this case." The state, to prove a former conviction of the defendant before said D. H. Harris, J. P., introduced the following record of said D. H. Harris, J. P., in words and figures as follows, to wit: "In justice court, Salt River Tp. State of Missouri, county of Audrain. State of Missouri, Plaintiff, vs. Press Brown, Defndt. Before D. H. Harris, J. P. Warrant for Arrest. Charge, Stealing. Now, on this the 14th day of June, 1890, comes F. R. Jesse, prosecuting att'y for Audrain county, Mo., and upon his official oath files his information against the defendant, and asks that a state warrant be issued for the defendant, whereupon a state warrant was issued, and delivered to Const. W. P. Quissenberry, of Salt River Townp., June 14th, '90, who on the same day arrested and brought into court the defendant. The prosecuting attorney read to the defendant the charge. Defendant plead not guilty. The court, after hearing the testimony pro and con, rendered judgment against the defendant, and in favor of the state, and assessed his punishment at 30 days' imprisonment in the county jail. Commitment and the defendant delivered to Const. W. P. Quissenberry, of Salt River Tp., who took defendant to jail. D. H. Harris, J. P. Transcript and papers delivered to circuit clerk June 24th, 1890. D. H. H." To the introduction of which defendant objected, but the court overruled said objection, and permitted said record read to the jury, to which ruling and action of the court the defendant excepted, and saved his exceptions at the time. The state also introduced in evidence the following commitment, in words as follows, to wit: "(Commitment of J. P.) State of Missouri, county of Audrain — ss: The state of Missouri to the jailer of the county of Audrain, greeting: Whereas, complaint has been made before me, a justice of the peace for said county, upon oath of F. R. Jesse, Pros. Att'y, that one Press Brown, late of the county of Audrain, and state of Missouri, did on the 10th day of June, 1890, at the county of Audrain, in the state of Missouri, steal and take away one pair of pants, of the value of $4.00, the property of Wm. Galloway, against the peace and dignity of the state; and whereas, the said Press Brown was brought before me upon a warrant duly issued upon the...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
16 cases
  • State v. Whipkey
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • December 13, 1948
    ...from the penitentiary. R.S. 1939, sec. 4854; State v. Austin, 113 Mo. 538, 21 S.W. 31; State v. Brinkley, 193 S.W.2d 49; State v. Brown, 115 Mo. 409, 22 S.W. 367; v. Hamilton, 340 Mo. 768, 102 S.W.2d 642; State v. Krebs, 336 Mo. 516, 80 S.W.2d 196; State v. Sumpter, 335 Mo. 620, 73 S.W.2d 7......
  • Bickett v. Knight
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • May 25, 1915
    ... ... 333 BICKETT, Atty. Gen. v. KNIGHT. (No. 547.) Supreme Court of North Carolina. May 25, 1915.         Clark, C. J., and Brown, J., dissenting.         Appeal from Superior Court, Buncombe County, Webb, Judge.         Action by the State, on the relation ... ...
  • State v. King
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • February 14, 1955
    ...of conviction of the St. Louis court of criminal correction, see State v. Bruckner, Mo.App., 272 S.W. 1061, 1062. State v. Brown, 1893, 115 Mo. 409, 415, 22 S.W. 367, 369(3), was a prosecution for the commission of a second petit larceny at a time when our habitual criminal act, RSMo 1889, ......
  • State v. Donnelly
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • November 19, 1895
    ...State v. Wieners, 66 Mo. 13. (3) The court should have instructed that the indictment constituted no evidence against defendant. State v. Brown, 115 Mo. 409; State Duncan, 116 Mo. 302. (4) The court erred in refusing to give instructions A, B, and F asked by defendant. (5) There was no evid......
  • Get Started for Free