State v. Brown, 80-1197

Decision Date10 March 1981
Docket NumberNo. 80-1197,80-1197
PartiesThe STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Clifford BROWN and Anthony Crumity, Appellees.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Janet Reno, State Atty. and Stephen V. Rosin, Asst. State Atty., for appellant.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Michael Zelman, Asst. Public Defender, for Anthony Crumity.

Long & Smith and Harold Long, Jr., Miami, for Clifford Brown.

Before HUBBART, C. J., and BASKIN and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The order under review suppressing the evidence in this cause is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings upon a holding that: (a) the defendants (Clifford Brown and Anthony Crumity) were lawfully stopped by the police and subjected to a valid temporary detention based on articulable suspicion of auto theft and driving with an expired license plate, State v. Stevens, 354 So.2d 1244 (Fla.2d DCA 1978); (b) the furtive hand movements of both defendants under the car seat, during the subsequent police investigation after the stop, constituted articulable suspicion that the defendants were armed and dangerous, which, in turn, justified the police in searching under the car seat and seizing two guns thereunder after the police had validly ordered both defendants out of the car, Pennsylvania v. Mimms, 434 U.S. 106, 98 S.Ct. 330, 54 L.Ed.2d 331 (1977); Brown v. State, 358 So.2d 596 (Fla.2d DCA 1978); Stevens v. State, 354 So.2d 110 (Fla.3d DCA 1978); and (c) the lack of standing contention raised by the state is not here reached as, in any event, the instant search was a reasonable one even assuming the defendants had standing to challenge the search, see Gray v. State, 177 So.2d 868 (Fla.3d DCA 1965), cert. denied, 188 So.2d 815 (Fla.1966).

Reversed and remanded.

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • Dewberry v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • June 24, 2005
    ...and dangerous."); C.G. v. State, 689 So.2d 1246 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997); State v. Kinnane, 689 So.2d 1088 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996); State v. Brown, 395 So.2d 1202 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 407 So.2d 1102 (Fla.1981); see also State v. Dilyerd, 467 So.2d 301, 302 (Fla. 1985) (holding the search of ......
  • State v. Dilyerd
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • April 4, 1985
    ...as Dilyerd v. State, 444 So.2d 577 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984). We have jurisdiction because of direct and express conflict with State v. Brown, 395 So.2d 1202 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 407 So.2d 1102 (Fla.1981). Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. The incident with which we are concerned took place in an ......
  • Williams v. State, 82-858
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • March 29, 1983
    ...his subsequent insistence upon retrieving it himself, created an articulable suspicion that the defendant might be armed. State v. Brown, 395 So.2d 1202 (Fla. 3d DCA), pet. for review denied, 407 So.2d 1102 (Fla.1981); Brown v. State, 358 So.2d 596 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978); Stevens v. State, 354 ......
  • Calvo v. State, 81-2648
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • December 14, 1982
    ...1921, 32 L.Ed.2d 612 (1972); State v. Webb, 398 So.2d 820 (Fla.1981); Russell v. State, 415 So.2d 797 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); State v. Brown, 395 So.2d 1202 (Fla. 3d DCA), petition for review denied, 407 So.2d 1102 ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT