State v. Bruce

• Decision Date: 31 October 1882
• Citation: 77 Mo. 193
• Parties: THE STATE v. BRUCE, Appellant.
• Court: Missouri Supreme Court

77 Mo. 193

THE STATE

v.BRUCE, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Missouri.

October Term, 1882.

Appeal from Nodaway Circuit Court.--HON. H. S. KELLEY, Judge.

REVERSED.

Frank Griffen for appellant.

D. H. McIntyre, Attorney General, and Edwards & Ramsey for the State.

HENRY, J.

The defendant was indicted at the November term, 1881, of the Nodaway circuit court for perjury, and on a trial was found guilty and sentenced to six years' imprisonment in the penitentiary. He has appealed from the judgment, and the only question for our consideration is, whether the failure of the prosecuting attorney to sign the indictment is fatal to it.

Section 1798 of the Revised Statutes of 1879, provides that: “Every indictment must be signed by the prosecuting attorney, and when the grand jury return any indictment into court, the judge must examine it, and, if the foreman has neglected to indorse it ‘a true bill,’ with his name signed thereto, or, if the prosecuting attorney has not signed it, the court must cause the foreman to indorse or the prosecuting attorney to sign it as the case may require, in the presence of the jury.” This section is imperative with regard to the signature of the prosecuting attorney. It is a new section, and never, in this State, before its enactment, was the prosecuting attorney required to sign an indictment.

In Thomas v. The State, 6 Mo. 457, the objection was made that the indictment was not subscribed by the circuit attorney, and the defendant relied upon the 6th section of article 3 of the act to regulate practice at law, Revised Statutes 1835, which directed that declarations and other pleadings should be signed by the party or his attorney; but the court held that that statute had no application to practice in criminal cases, and Judge Tompkins, who delivered the opinion of the court, observed that he was not aware of any provision in the act regulating practice in criminal cases requiring the circuit attorney to subscribe his name to indictments.

The act of 1835, and every revision of the statute since made, contained a provision, that no indictment can be found without the concurrence of at least twelve grand jurors, and when so found, and not otherwise, the foreman of the grand jury shall certify under his hand that it is “a true bill.” It has been repeatedly held that when the grand jury in a body has returned an indictment into open court, and the records show that fact, the omission of the certificate of the foreman is not fatal to the...