State v. Burroughs
Decision Date | 03 August 1881 |
Citation | 72 Me. 479 |
Parties | STATE v. JAMES BURROUGHS. |
Court | Maine Supreme Court |
ON EXCEPTIONS from superior court, Kennebec county.
The case is stated in the opinion.
H. M. Heath, county attorney, for the State, cited: State v. Flynn, 36 N.H. 64; Decker v. Somerset Ins. Co. 66 Me. 408.
E. W. Whitehouse, for the defendant.
The instruction complained of was erroneous. I do not understand that the law makes any distinction whatever in the weight of testimony required under a search and seizure and any other crime. In all criminal prosecutions the same weight, degree and amount of testimony are required for a conviction. 3 Greenl. Ev. 29.
This is a complaint for search and seizure, appealed from the municipal court of Augusta, and is brought here on exceptions to the rulings of the justice presiding at nisi prius.
1. The judge in his charge, said to the jury, " You have a right to consider, however, in this case, the question whether it requires the same amount of proof, the same weight to fasten upon a man the crime of selling intoxicating liquors, or keeping them with intent to sell, in view of the penalty attached, as it would to fasten upon him a higher crime for which the penalty was much severer."
Here is no rule of law given. The jury were told they were at liberty to consider the criminality of an offence, and the severity of its punishment as circumstances bearing upon the greater or lesser probability of its commission. It was left to them to determine the effect of those as of all other facts and circumstances in proof bearing on the guilt or innocence of the respondent.
2. Bottles, glasses, and measures identified as found in the defendant's shop, were received in evidence, to the introduction of which, the objection was made that their seizure was unauthorized by the warrant. They were or might be implements used in unlawful traffic. They were admissible in evidence however obtained. Their evidentiary force was for the jury. They are nevertheless articles of evidence, even if procured by an unauthorized and illegal search. State v. Plunkett, 64 Me. 536; State v. McGlynn, 34 N.H. 422; State v. Flynn, 36 N.H. 64; Com. v. Dana, 2 Met. 329.
Exceptions overruled.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
People v. Castree
...564, 246 S. W. 860;State v. Magnano, 97 Conn. 543, 117 Atl. 550;Johnson v. State, 152 Ga. 271, 109 S. E. 662, 19 A. L. R. 641;State v. Burroughs, 72 Me. 479;State v. Hesse (Minn.) 191 N. W. 267;Billings v. State (Neb.) 191 N. W. 721;State v. Pauley (N. D.) 192 N. W. 91;State v. Agalos, 79 N......
-
State v. Hawkins
...never used the rule of exclusion until required to do so by Mapp v. Ohio, supra. See for example, State v. Plunkett, 64 Me. 534; State v. Burroughs, 72 Me. 479; Brown v. Robbins, 122 F.Supp. 229 (D.C.Me.), (1954).4 In State v. Cadigan, supra, this Court ruled the phrase 'A warrant shall iss......
-
State v. Chin Gim
... ... Shields v. State, 104 Ala. 35, 16 So. 85, 53 Am. St ... Rep. 17; People v. Le Doux, 155 Cal. 535, 102 P ... 517; Gindrat v. People, 138 Ill. 103, 27 N.E. 1085; ... State v. Miller, 63 Kan. 62, 64 P. 1033; State ... v. Burroughs, 72 Me. 479; Commonwealth v. Dana, 2 ... Metc. (Mass.) 329; Commonwealth v. Wilkins, 243 ... Mass. 356, 138 N.E. 11; State v. Pomeroy, 130 Mo ... 489, 32 S.W. 1002; State v. Flynn, 36 N.H. 64; ... People v. Adams, 176 N.Y. 351, 68 N.E. 636, 63 L. R ... A. 406, 98 Am. St. Rep. 675, ... ...
-
State v. Inlow
... ... recommendation respecting it, there is ample authority for ... holding that it is not error to refuse to instruct what the ... prescribed penalty is for the charged offense. On the other ... hand, there is good authority for holding that it is not ... error to so instruct. State v. Burroughs , 72 Me ... 479; Miller v. Commonwealth (Va.) 21 S.E. 499; ... Commonwealth v. Harris , 168 Pa. 619, 32 A. 92. I ... think it the better practice to give the instruction ... One ... reason urged against it is that the jury, in such case, has ... nothing to do with the ... ...