State v. Butts

Decision Date03 April 1991
Docket Number90-675,Nos. 90-653,s. 90-653
Citation569 N.E.2d 885,58 Ohio St.3d 250
PartiesThe STATE of Ohio, Appellee, v. BUTTS, Appellant.
CourtOhio Supreme Court

Syllabus by the Court

R.C. 2929.41(A) requires that a sentence imposed for a misdemeanor conviction must be served concurrently with any felony sentence.

Appellant, William George Butts, pleaded guilty to petty theft, a first degree misdemeanor, in Stark County Common Pleas Court and was sentenced to a six-month term to be served consecutively with a reimposed felony sentence for parole violation based on the misdemeanor conviction. The Court of Appeals for Stark County affirmed the sentence. Finding its judgment to be in conflict with the judgment of the Court of Appeals for Butler County in State v. O'Dell (Apr. 13, 1987), No. CA86-10-142, unreported, 1987 WL 9747, the court of appeals certified the record of the case to this court for review and final determination.

Robert D. Horowitz, Pros. Atty., and Ronald Mark Caldwell, Canton, for appellee.

Robert G. Lavery, Alliance, for appellant.

WRIGHT, Justice.

In a refreshing bit of candor during oral argument, counsel for the state admitted that the prosecution was as surprised by the consecutive sentence as the defendant. So are we.

At issue is the meaning of R.C. 2929.41, which provides, in part:

"(A) Except as provided in division (B) of this section, a sentence of imprisonment shall be served concurrently with any other sentence of imprisonment imposed by a court of this state, another state, or the United States. In any case, a sentence of imprisonment for misdemeanor shall be served concurrently with a sentence of imprisonment for felony served in a state or federal penal or reformatory institution." (Emphasis added.)

While we sympathize with the chagrin of a trial judge confronted with a repeat offender, we hold that R.C. 2929.41(A) requires that a sentence imposed for a misdemeanor conviction must be served concurrently with any felony sentence.

The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed and the cause is remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded.

MOYER, C.J., and SWEENEY, HOLMES, DOUGLAS, HERBERT R. BROWN and RESNICK, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
24 cases
  • State v. Farley
    • United States
    • Ohio Court of Appeals
    • 1 Agosto 2012
    ...with a prison term or sentence of imprisonment for felony served in a state or federal correctional institution." In State v. Butts, 58 Ohio St,3d 250, 569 N.E.2d 885 (1991), syllabus, the Ohio Supreme Court held that "R.C. 2929.41(A) requires that a sentence imposed for a misdemeanor convi......
  • State v. Owens, 2008 Ohio 3555 (Ohio App. 7/17/2008)
    • United States
    • Ohio Court of Appeals
    • 17 Julio 2008
    ...to be served concurrently with any time ordered on the attendant felony count of vehicular assault. See R.C. 2929.41(A); State v. Butts (1991), 58 Ohio St.3d 250, {¶ 20} By listing the failure to stop at the scene of an accident in a furthermore clause rather than as a separate offense, the......
  • State v. Miller, 2007 Ohio 6272 (Ohio App. 11/19/2007), 2007CA00142.
    • United States
    • Ohio Court of Appeals
    • 19 Noviembre 2007
    ...we note appellant was sentenced to concurrent sentences on the felony counts pursuant to a negotiated plea. Pursuant to State v. Butts (1991), 58 Ohio St.3d 250, the sentences on the misdemeanor counts by operation of law merged with the sentences on the felony {¶26} Upon review, we do not ......
  • State v. Howard R. Russell
    • United States
    • Ohio Court of Appeals
    • 10 Abril 1991
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT