State v. Byrd, 1
Decision Date | 01 December 1965 |
Docket Number | No. 1,CA-CR,1 |
Citation | 2 Ariz.App. 304,408 P.2d 237 |
Parties | The STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. Larry E. BYRD, Appellant. 36. |
Court | Arizona Court of Appeals |
Darrell F. Smith, Atty. Gen., by Gary Nelson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
William H. (Rod) Wood, Phoenix, for appellant.
Appellant was charged, tried and found guilty by a jury, of two counts of the crime of unlawfully killing livestock of another, a felony, in violation of A.R.S. Section 24-246. The judgment of guilty on each count was pronounced by the trial court on April 23, 1963. The imposition of sentence was suspended and the appellant was placed on probation for a period of five years on terms of probation as set down by the trial court. No notice of appeal was filed by the appellant within sixty days of the date of the rendition of judgment of guilty. On January 12, 1965, the trial court ordered revocation of probation and sentenced appellant to be confined in the Arizona State Prison for not less than four years nor more than five years, the sentence to date from January 12, 1965. On March 11, 1965, a notice of appeal was filed on behalf of the appellant.
It is the position of the appellant that, at the time of his arrest, he was denied his constitutional right to the assistance of counsel as defined in the case of Escobedo v. State of Illinois, 378 U.S. 478, 84 S.Ct. 1758, 12 L.Ed.2d 977 (1964). The first question we must decide, however, is whether appellant perfected a timely appeal. The Supreme Court of the State of Arizona in the case of State of Arizona v. Heron, 92 Ariz. 114, 374 P.2d 871 (1962), stated in applicable part at page 871 of the Pacific Reports:
We hold that the appellant did not perfect a timely appeal and, therefore, this Court is without jurisdiction in this proceeding, to determine the constitutional question presented by the appeal.
Judgment affirmed.
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Veres
...off on his appeal until, for instance, his probation is revoked.' This Court quoted the foregoing portion of Heron in State v. Byrd, 2 Ariz.App. 304, 408 P.2d 237 (1965) and relying thereon, dismissed an appeal from a judgment of guilt which appeal was entered after the revocation of probat......
-
State v. Osborn
...sixty days from the date of the entry of the judgment of guilt. In reaching that result the Court of Appeals overruled State v. Byrd, 2 Ariz.App. 304, 408 P.2d 237 (1965), and found the following language in our case, State v. Heron, 92 Ariz. 114, 374 P.2d 871 (1962), to be dictum: 'He may ......