State v. Cahill

Decision Date13 June 1956
Citation298 P.2d 214,208 Or. 538
PartiesSTATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Otto W. CAHILL, Appellant.
CourtOregon Supreme Court

Harry G. Hoy, Oceanlake, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was B. Richard Anderson, Newport.

William T. Hollen, Sp. Deputy Dist. Atty., Newport, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Robert Y. Thornton, Atty. Gen., for Oregon, Walter W. Foster, Dist. Atty., Dallas, and T. R. Adams, Sp. Deputy Dist. Atty., Taft.

PER CURIAM.

The former opinion and judgment affirming the conviction of the defendant is adhered to.

ROSSMAN, J., adheres to his former dissent.

TOOZE, J., adheres to his former dissent.

To continue reading

Request your trial
27 cases
  • State v. Hanna
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • November 16, 1960
    ...means to convert fraudulently to one's own use.' The state relies upon State of Oregon v. Cahill, 1956, 208 Or. 538, 560, 293 P.2d 169, 298 P.2d 214, certiorari denied, 1956, 352 U.S. 895, 77 S.Ct. 132, 1 L.Ed.2d 87, for the proposition that a criminal intent is not an essential element of ......
  • State v. Wagner
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • February 26, 1988
    ...193 Pac. 927), is not, in the opinion of this court, the better view." State v. Cahill, 208 Or. 538, 293 P.2d 169, rehearing, 208 Or. 538, 298 P.2d 214 (1956), also stands for the proposition that section 3 is applicable to criminal Defendant argues that unless we overrule those cases by ho......
  • State v. Mains
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • September 27, 1983
    ...prejudicial error appears." We reaffirmed the same general concept in State v. Cahill, 208 Or. 538, 582, 293 P.2d 169, aff'd on rehearing 298 P.2d 214, cert. den. 352 U.S. 895, 77 S.Ct. 132, 1 L.Ed.2d 87 (1956), overruled on other grounds State v. Hanna, 224 Or. 588, 592, 356 P.2d 1046 (196......
  • Nielsen v. Brown
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • September 26, 1962
    ...instance or whom it hurts, as an aid in the 'search for truth and justice.' State of Oregon v. Cahill, 208 Or. 538, 582, 293 P.2d 169, 298 P.2d 214, cert. den. 352 U.S. 895, 77 S.Ct. 132, 1 L.Ed.2d No order of the circuit court for a physical examination of the plaintiff appears to have bee......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT