State v. Cahill
Decision Date | 13 June 1956 |
Citation | 298 P.2d 214,208 Or. 538 |
Parties | STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Otto W. CAHILL, Appellant. |
Court | Oregon Supreme Court |
Harry G. Hoy, Oceanlake, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was B. Richard Anderson, Newport.
William T. Hollen, Sp. Deputy Dist. Atty., Newport, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Robert Y. Thornton, Atty. Gen., for Oregon, Walter W. Foster, Dist. Atty., Dallas, and T. R. Adams, Sp. Deputy Dist. Atty., Taft.
The former opinion and judgment affirming the conviction of the defendant is adhered to.
ROSSMAN, J., adheres to his former dissent.
TOOZE, J., adheres to his former dissent.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Hanna
...means to convert fraudulently to one's own use.' The state relies upon State of Oregon v. Cahill, 1956, 208 Or. 538, 560, 293 P.2d 169, 298 P.2d 214, certiorari denied, 1956, 352 U.S. 895, 77 S.Ct. 132, 1 L.Ed.2d 87, for the proposition that a criminal intent is not an essential element of ......
-
State v. Wagner
...193 Pac. 927), is not, in the opinion of this court, the better view." State v. Cahill, 208 Or. 538, 293 P.2d 169, rehearing, 208 Or. 538, 298 P.2d 214 (1956), also stands for the proposition that section 3 is applicable to criminal Defendant argues that unless we overrule those cases by ho......
-
State v. Mains
...prejudicial error appears." We reaffirmed the same general concept in State v. Cahill, 208 Or. 538, 582, 293 P.2d 169, aff'd on rehearing 298 P.2d 214, cert. den. 352 U.S. 895, 77 S.Ct. 132, 1 L.Ed.2d 87 (1956), overruled on other grounds State v. Hanna, 224 Or. 588, 592, 356 P.2d 1046 (196......
-
Nielsen v. Brown
...instance or whom it hurts, as an aid in the 'search for truth and justice.' State of Oregon v. Cahill, 208 Or. 538, 582, 293 P.2d 169, 298 P.2d 214, cert. den. 352 U.S. 895, 77 S.Ct. 132, 1 L.Ed.2d No order of the circuit court for a physical examination of the plaintiff appears to have bee......