State v. Campbell, 100 Ohio St.3d 361 (Ohio 12/31/2003), Case No. 2003-0045.

Decision Date31 December 2003
Docket NumberCase No. 2003-0045.
Citation2003 Ohio 6804,100 Ohio St.3d 361
PartiesThe State of Ohio, Appellee, <I>v.</I> Campbell, Appellant.
CourtOhio Supreme Court

Michael K. Allen and Philip R. Cummings, for appellee.

Richard Feil III, for appellant.

O'CONNOR, J.

{¶1} We are presented with a question of law certified by the First District Court of Appeals as having received conflicting answers from the various districts. To harmonize the application of the laws of the state of Ohio, we hold that the amendment of a criminal charge from one subparagraph of R.C. 4511.19(A) to another subparagraph of the same subsection does not change the name and identity of the charged offense within the meaning of Crim.R. 7(B).

{¶2} Christopher Campbell was cited for driving while under the influence of alcohol in violation of R.C. 4511.19 following an automobile collision on May 26, 2001. On Campbell's citation, the arresting officer recorded Campbell's "blood alcohol concentration" as ".203" and checked a box indicating that he obtained this result via a breath test. This information indicates that Campbell violated R.C. 4511.19(A)(6). The officer, however, mistakenly indicated that the charge was for violation of R.C. 4511.19(A)(5), which may be charged following a blood test. Campbell was charged with violating R.C. 4511.19(A)(5) and 4511.19(A)(1) and with failure to control his motor vehicle.

{¶3} On August 28, 2001, the state moved that the R.C. 4511.19(A)(5) charge be amended to a charge of violating R.C. 4511.19(A)(6). The motion was granted over Campbell's objection, and the cause was reset for trial. On September 27, 2001, Campbell changed his plea to no contest on the (A)(6) charge. The state dropped the (A)(1) charge and the charge of failure to control. Campbell was found guilty of violating R.C. 4511.19(A)(6) and sentenced accordingly.

{¶4} On appeal, Campbell argued that amending the charge violated Crim.R. 7(D). Noting conflicting opinions from other appellate districts, the court of appeals affirmed the conviction and certified the conflict to us. Upon due consideration, we affirm the court of appeals.

{¶5} We were faced with an analogous question in State v. Spirko (1991), 59 Ohio St.3d 1, 570 N.E.2d 229. In Spirko, we unanimously affirmed a conviction and death sentence where the defendant claimed undue surprise because the state had amended the charge to allege a violation of a different paragraph of the same statute. "[I]t is clear that the state merely caused the correct section number to be applied to the indictment. The language itself was not changed, and it is unclear how defendant can claim that he was `surprised' in any way." Id. at 21, 570 N.E.2d 229. This reasoning holds true here.

{¶6} The officer clearly indicated that he determined alcohol concentration by a breath test. Despite the officer's erroneous reference to R.C. 4511.19(A...

To continue reading

Request your trial
18 cases
  • Baer v. Clipper
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Ohio
    • 28 Enero 2013
    ... ... Case No. 2:10-cv-1164 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION AT COLUMBUS January 28, 2013 ... not fairly presented as federal claims in state court. Other claims need further development. Id ... State v. Campbell, 150 Ohio App.3d 90, 2002 Ohio 6064, 779 N.E.2d 811, at P24, affirmed by State v. Campbell, 100 Ohio St.3d 361, 2003 Ohio 6804, 800 N.E.2d 356 ... ...
  • State v. Baer, 2009 Ohio 3248 (Ohio App. 6/23/2009)
    • United States
    • Ohio Court of Appeals
    • 23 Junio 2009
    ... ... Case No. CRI-2206-0691 ... State v. Campbell, 150 Ohio App.3d 90, 2002-Ohio-6064, 779 N.E.2d 811, at ¶24, affirmed by State v. Campbell, 100 Ohio St.3d 361, 2003-Ohio-6804, 800 N.E.2d 356 ... ...
  • State v. Wise, 2008 Ohio 7003 (Ohio App. 12/31/2008)
    • United States
    • Ohio Court of Appeals
    • 31 Diciembre 2008
    ... ... appeal from the Cambridge Municipal Court, Case No. 07TRC09847 ...         Affirmed ... Campbell, 150 Ohio App.3d 90, 779 N.E.2d 811, ... Campbell, 100 Ohio St.3d 361, 800 N.E.2d 356, 2003-Ohio-6804 ... ...
  • State v. Carter, 2005 Ohio 1347 (OH 3/18/2004)
    • United States
    • Ohio Supreme Court
    • 18 Marzo 2004
    ... ... J'Maine Carter, Defendant-Appellant ... Case No. 03-MA-245 ... Court of Appeals of Ohio, ... State v. Campbell , 150 Ohio App.3d 90, 779 N.E.2d 811, 064, at ¶24, affirmed by State v. Campbell , 100 Ohio St.3d 361, 800 N.E.2d 356, 2003-Ohio-6804 ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT