State v. Carpenter

Decision Date01 November 1989
Citation213 Conn. 804,567 A.2d 834
PartiesSTATE of Connecticut v. Malcolm CARPENTER.
CourtConnecticut Supreme Court

William H. Narwold, Hartford, in support of the petition.

Rita M. Shair, Deputy Asst. State's Atty., in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 19 Conn.App. 48, 562 A.2d 35, is denied.

To continue reading

Request your trial
29 cases
  • State v. Jarmon, AC 42357
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • 14 Enero 2020
    ...charged under General Statutes [§ 53a-212 (a) ] ...." State v. Carpenter , 19 Conn. App. 48, 59, 562 A.2d 35, cert. denied, 213 Conn. 804, 567 A.2d 834 (1989). "The operability of a firearm can be proven either by circumstantial or direct evidence." State v. Bradley , supra, 39 Conn. App. a......
  • State v. Dickerson
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • 21 Julio 1992
    ... ... 322, 324, 507 A.2d 457 (1986). For this reason, we have regularly characterized as error any but the most minor departure from the language required by § 54-84(b). State v. Mebane, 19 Conn.App. 618, 623-24, 563 A.2d 1026, cert. denied, 212 Conn. 817, 565 A.2d 538 (1989); State v. Carpenter, 19 ... Page 774 ... Conn.App. 48, 55, 562 A.2d 35, cert. denied, 213 Conn. 804, 567 A.2d 834 (1989); State v. Thurman, 10 Conn.App. 302, 309, 523 A.2d 891, cert. denied, 204 Conn. 805, 528 A.2d 1152 (1987) ...         We conclude that the charge as given was appropriate. The ... ...
  • State v. Crosby
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • 23 Marzo 1995
    ...v. Boscarino, 204 Conn. 714, 720, 529 A.2d 1260 (1987); State v. Carpenter, 19 Conn.App. 48, 62, 562 A.2d 35, cert. denied, 213 Conn. 804, 567 A.2d 834 (1989). The defendant bears the heavy burden of showing that a denial of severance resulted in substantial injustice beyond the curative po......
  • State v. Holloway
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • 10 Noviembre 2009
    ... ... Because it is axiomatic that this court is vested with the authority to remand a case for resentencing; see, e.g., State v. Hanson, 210 Conn. 519, 556 A.2d 1007 (1989); State v. Carpenter, 19 Conn.App. 48, 562 A.2d 35, cert. denied, 213 Conn. 804, 567 A.2d 834 (1989); the appropriate remedy for this claim is a remand to the trial court with direction to resentence the defendant. See State v. Dennis, 30 Conn.App. 416, 426, 621 A.2d 292, cert. denied, 226 Conn. 901, 625 A.2d 1376 ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT