State v. Casey
Decision Date | 27 June 1931 |
Docket Number | 195. |
Citation | 159 S.E. 337,201 N.C. 185 |
Parties | STATE v. CASEY. |
Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Appeal from Superior Court, Lenoir County; W. A. Devin, Judge.
Herman Casey was convicted of murder in the first degree, and he appeals.
No error.
Where evidence justifies charge on manslaughter, court's failure to give such charge is error.
The defendant, Herman Casey, was tried upon a bill of indictment charging him with murder in the first degree of James C Causey. A verdict of guilty of murder in the first degree on the bill of indictment was returned by the jury, and the defendant was thereupon sentenced by the court below to death by electrocution.
The evidence was to the effect that James C. Causey was from Suffolk, Va., but was living in Goldsboro, N. C., prior to July 3, 1930, and was working for the Atlas Plywood Corporation. It had bought out the Utility Manufacturing Company, and he was in charge of the logging operations in the woods. Causey drove a Hudson coach, belonging to the company. The defendant Casey knew Causey, and who he was working for. Defendant Casey was hauling some hogshead stave timber during the summer of 1930, shortly before July 3 1930, off the land of one John H. Sutton. There was a controversy between Sutton and the Utility Manufacturing Company (then owned by the Atlas Plywood Corporation, located at Goldsboro, N. C.) over who owned the land the timber was cut off of. Some of this timber was sold by defendant Casey to Goldsboro Lumber Company, at Dover, N. C., some three or four weeks before July 3, five and three-fourths cords amounting to some $28.75. The Goldsboro Lumber Company was notified by one E. H. Graham, an officer of the Atlas Plywood Corporation, to stop payment, which was done. Defendant Casey, as testified to by one Blandford, connected with the Goldsboro Lumber Company, on July 3d, the day it is alleged Causey was killed, about eleven thirty or one thirty, was trying to get the money, claiming it was coming to him, and that he understood bond had been executed for the timber. He told John Bryant, who he was hauling lumber for, on the morning of July 3d, having delivered some timber to the Goldsboro Lumber Company, at Dover, N. C., where defendant left him about eleven o'clock, that he got balled up with the Goldsboro Lumber Company about $35.
E. H Graham testified, in part:
Luby Underwood, testified, in part: (Defendant objects and excepts to above testimony; overruled; exception).
Peter Brown testified, in part:
John Anthony Brown testified, in part:
Thurman Morris testified, in part:
C. S. Cornwell, testified, in part:
Henry West testified, in part:
Decatur Nobles testified, in part:
Jerry Sutton testified, in part: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial- State v. Casey
-
State v. Calcutt
... ... upon which suspension of execution is made to depend would be ... referred to the next term after the case gets back in the ... Superior Court. This is clearly the rationale of the statute ... (C.S. § 4654) and the decisions of this court. State v ... Casey, 201 N.C. 185, 159 S.E. 337. And if that rule has ... not been fully established, this court has the right, in the ... exercise of its constitutional power to "issue any ... remedial writs necessary to give it general supervision and ... control over the proceedings of the inferior courts," to ... ...
-
State v. Payne
... ... malice, which are necessary to convict of murder in the first ... degree. State v. Tate, supra; State v. Shouse, 166 ... N.C. 306, 81 S.E. 333; State v. Graham, supra; State v ... Miller, supra; State v. Wishon, 198 N.C. 762, 153 ... S.E. 395; State v. Casey, 201 N.C. 185, 159 S.E ... "General ... threats to kill not shown to have any reference to the ... deceased are not admissible in evidence, but a threat to kill ... or injure some one not definitely designated is admissible in ... evidence, where other facts adduced give ... ...
-
State v. McKinnon
...218 N.C. 415, 11 S.E.2d 321; State v. Hammonds, 216 N.C. 67, 3 S.E.2d 439; State v. Everhardt, 203 N.C. 610, 166 S.E. 738; State v. Casey, 201 N.C. 185, 159 S.E. 337; State v. Lawrence, 196 N.C. 562, 146 S.E. The defendants' exception No 14 is to that portion of his Honor's charge as follow......