State v. Cheetham
Decision Date | 19 May 1898 |
Citation | 19 Wash. 330,53 P. 349 |
Parties | STATE EX REL. HOWLETT v. CHEETHAM, STATE AUDITOR. |
Court | Washington Supreme Court |
Original application for writ.
Petition by the state, on the relation of L. S. Howlett, for writ of mandamus to Neal Cheetham, state auditor. Heard on application for writ. Denied.
Bogle & Rigg, for plaintiff.
P. H Winston, Atty. Gen., for defendant.
The relator seeks by this proceeding to compel the state auditor to issue to him a warrant for his salary as arid land commissioner claimed to have been earned since March 25th last. He held the position under appointment of the executive, and his term would not have expired by limitation until June 16, 1899, under the act. Laws 1895, p. 452. On March 25th aforesaid action was taken by the governor as follows: -and a copy was served as specified in the act under which the same was had. Laws 1893, p. 247. A question is raised as to whether mandamus is an appropriate remedy, under the showing made here. But, considering the importance of having matters of this kind speedily determined, in order that public interests may...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State ex rel. Hamilton v. Grant
... ... interested. This is entirely different from statutes ... providing that the Governor may remove for cause or for ... sufficient cause. (State v. Hewitt, supra; Trimble v ... People, 19 Colo. 187; People v. Martin, 19 ... Colo. 565; People v. Orr, 22 Colo. 142; State v ... Cheetham, 19 Wash. 330.) Any reasonable construction ... will be resorted to in order to sustain an act of the ... Legislature. (Barkwell v. Chatterton, 4 Wyo. 307.) ... BEARD, ... JUSTICE. PARMELEE, District Judge, concurs. POTTER, C. J., ... did not sit ... OPINION ... ...
-
Johnson v. Wash. State Conservation Comm'n
...with the constitution as it relates to appointed or elected officials.¶ 41 The appellants argue that in State ex rel. Howlett v. Cheetham , 19 Wash. 330, 332, 53 P. 349 (1898), our Supreme Court distinguished neglect of duty from misconduct and malfeasance. It did not. Indeed, the Howlett c......
-
State ex inf. Barker v. Crandall
... ... 191; State ex rel. v. Williams, 6 S.D. 119; ... Ayres v. Hatch, 175 Mass. 489; Shurtleff v ... United States, 118 U.S. 311; State v. McGarry, ... 21 Wis. 502; People v. Welty, 75 Ill.App. 514; ... State ex rel. v. Grant, 14 Wyo. 41; State ex rel. v ... Cheetham, 19 Wash. 330 ... BOND, ... J. Faris, Walker and Blair, JJ., concur; Woodson, C. J., not ... sitting; Graves and Revelle, JJ., dissent ... ... OPINION ... [269 ... Mo. 47] In Banc ... BOND, ... ...
-
State v. Johns
...of Thomas Burke of King county, Washington.' The order of removal in the Howlett Case is set out in full in the report of that case, 19 Wash. 330, 53 P. 349. The in the Fay Case was in the same form. The Governor's order in the present case has already been given herein. It will be noticed ......