State v. Chi., B. & Q. R. Co.
Decision Date | 28 February 1911 |
Docket Number | No. 16,535.,16,535. |
Citation | 88 Neb. 669,130 N.W. 295 |
Court | Nebraska Supreme Court |
Parties | STATE v. CHICAGO, B. & Q. R. CO. |
By the provisions of the Constitution this court has original jurisdiction of all civil cases in which the state is a party. Article 6, § 2.
Any civil action in which the state has such interest as that the action may be brought and prosecuted in the name of the state is within the original jurisdiction of this court.
A court of equity has jurisdiction to enjoin the violation by a railroad corporation of the act of 1909, which forbids intoxication and the drinking of intoxicating liquors upon railroad trains. Laws 1909, c. 83.
Such action is properly brought in the name of the state by the Attorney General acting in his official capacity, upon the application of the State Railway Commission; and when so brought this court has original jurisdiction thereof.
Action by the State against the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company. Demurrer to petition overruled.
W. T. Thompson and G. G. Martin, for the State.
Jas. E. Kelby and H. F. Rose, for defendant.
This is an original action in this court, begun in the name of the state by the Attorney General upon the application of the State Railway Commission. The petition alleges that defendant is a corporation authorized to do business in this state, and that the business which it is authorized to do That, notwithstanding the provisions and prohibitions of the statute hereinafter set forth, “the said defendant, by and through its employés, agents, conductors, and porters, has been continuously for many years last past, and now is, furnishing, supplying, and selling to its passengers patronizing said dining and buffet cars, through its servants, agents, conductors, and porters, in and upon its said dining and buffet cars in the state of Nebraska, intoxicating, malt, spirituous, and vinous liquors without itself, or its porters, servants, agents, or conductors first having procured a license to sell such liquors in the counties through which it hauls its said dining and buffet cars in the state of Nebraska.” It specified 45 counties of the state through which the defendant so operates, and alleges: The petition also asks for a temporary injunction against the defendant, restraining and enjoining the defendant, “its agents, officers, servants, conductors, employés, and porters, from selling intoxicating, malt, spirituous, or vinous liquors to its passengers or others on its said dining and buffet car or cars, or on any other of its said cars, in its trains carrying passengers in any of the counties in the state of Nebraska through which the same are hauled, in which defendant has not first procured a license to sell said liquors, and enjoining and restraining said defendant, its agents, officers, servants, conductors, employés, and porters, from suffering and allowing said liquors to be drunk upon its passenger trains within the state of Nebraska; that upon the final hearing of this cause said injunction be made perpetual.”
To this petition the defendants have filed a general demurrer upon two grounds: First. “The court has no jurisdiction of the subject-matter of the action.” Second. “The petition does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.” The statute forbids the selling of intoxicating liquors in this state without first obtaining a license therefor, and in 1909 the Legislature enacted a statute entitled, “An act to prevent intoxication and the drinking of intoxicating liquors on passenger trains and coaches in the state of Nebraska, and providing a penalty for failure to enforce the provisions thereof.” Laws 1909, c. 83. The act appears as section 4255c1 to 4255c4 of the Compiled Statutes of 1909. The first section of the act is as follows: “It shall be unlawful for any person to be found in a state of intoxication or to drink intoxicating liquors of any kind, as a beverage upon any railway passenger train, coach, closet or vestibule thereof, or platform connected therewith, while said passenger train or coach is in the service of passenger transportation within this state; and all conductors finding any person in a state of intoxication or drinking intoxicating liquors of any kind, as a beverage, upon said train or trains, are hereby authorized and empowered to remove such person from the train, and if any person found drinking intoxicating liquors thereon shall not desist or abstain immediately after being advised to so do by such conductor, then such intoxicated person or persons drinking intoxicating liquors, of any kind as a beverage upon said train, may be removed by such conductor at the first station at which the train may stop, having a depot and a depot platform, provided that such removal shall not take place in the night time, unless there are people upon said platform in whose charge such person so removed may be placed; and if the person removed has any unused portion of his ticket for transportation, the conductor so removing him from said train shall furnish the person so removed with a written statement showing the amount of such unused transportation, and the same shall entitle the holder to a refund, from the railroad company issuing the same, of the value of the unused transportation, which shall be payable at any station of the company where tickets are sold. upon demand and surrender of the conductor's written statement aforesaid.” The second section makes it a misdemeanor for any person to be found in an intoxicated condition riding upon railroad trains or found drinking intoxicating liquors of any kind as a beverage after having been ordered to desist therefrom by the conductor, while on such train. The third section makes it the duty of the railroad companies to keep the provisions of this act in plain, legible print posted in some conspicuous place in each and every passenger coach, sleeping or dining car; and the fourth section of the act makes it the duty of the Nebraska State Railway Commission “to see that the provisions of this act are enforced.”
The first question presented is as to the jurisdiction of this court. The original...
To continue reading
Request your trial- State ex rel. Hunter v. Araho
- State v. Fray
-
State v. Fray
...like cases are cited in the brief of appellee in support of the foregoing discussion. State ex rel. Attorney General v. Chicago, B. & Q. Railway Co., 88 Neb. 669, 130 N. W. 295, 34 L. R. A. (N. S.) 250;Attorney General v. Railroad, 35 Wis. 522-535-552;In re Debs, 158 U. S. 565, 15 S. Ct. 90......
-
State v. Maltby
...afforded would remedy the wrong that was threatened. Judge Sedgwick in State v. Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co., 88 Neb. 669, 34 L.R.A. n. s. 250, 130 N.W. 295, says: repeated, continuous and persistent violations of the statutes are what make them nuisances, independent of the express terms of the......
-
Neb. Const. art. V § V-2 Supreme Court; Number of Judges; Quorum; Jurisdiction; Retired Judges, Temporary Duty; Court Divisions; Assignments By Chief Justice
...226 N.W. 705 (1929). Original jurisdiction includes injunction to enforce intoxicating liquor law. State v. Chicago, B. and Q. R. R. Co., 88 Neb. 669, 130 N.W. 295 Original jurisdiction in cases in which the state is a party is not confined to those of mere pecuniary interest, but includes ......