State v. City of Daytona Beach
Decision Date | 28 December 1934 |
Citation | 158 So. 300,118 Fla. 29 |
Parties | STATE et al. v. CITY OF DAYTONA BEACH. |
Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Equitable proceeding by the City of Daytona Beach, wherein the State and others intervened. From an adverse final decree interveners appeal.
Affirmed with direction. Appeal from Circuit Court, Volusia County; M. B Smith, Judge.
Ray Selden, of Daytona Beach, for appellants.
Leon J. C. Harton, of Daytona Beach, for appellee.
This is an appeal prosecuted by certain interveners from a final decree rendered against them by the circuit court of the Seventh judicial circuit for the state of Florida in a statutory equitable proceeding instituted by the city of Daytona Beach under section 5106 et seq., Comp. Gen. Laws, section 3296 et seq., Rev. Gen. St., for the validation of $280,000 water revenue certificates proposed to be issued by the City of Daytona Beach.
The principal question to be decided on this appeal is whether or not the city of Daytona Beach had the power and authority under its charter (FN1) to fund certain anticipated revenues of its water supply and distribution system by borrowing the present value of several years anticipation thereof, to be repaid with interest, solely out of the water revenues anticipated under contractual terms binding solely and only in the nature of debentures on the special water revenues to be realized, and not constituting either a direct or contingent pledge or obligation of the municipality's taxing power so as to authorize the municipality of Daytona Beach to execute and deliver appropriate certificates of indebtedness purporting to create and express a legal obligation on the part of the municipality for the repayment of the amounts of the certificates out of the water revenues pledged, if, when, and as realized and available for that purpose. rn1. Chapter 10466, Sp. Acts 1925, as amended by chapters 11461 and 11464, Acts 1925, Ex. Sess., by chapters 13997 and 13998, Sp. Acts 1929, by chapter 15158, Sp. Acts 1931, and by chapter 16389, Sp. Acts 1933, Laws of Florida.
It appears from the record that authority was conferred upon the city of Daytona Beach by section 146 of the city charter, known as chapter 10466, Sp. Acts 1925, to construct, establish and maintain waterworks and to bore and dig wells, construct reservoirs, lay pipes, and to do such other things as may be necessary, essential or convenient for procuring and distributing an abundant supply of good and wholesome water to the inhabitants of the city of Daytona Beach for domestic and other purposes and to protect the property of the city and its inhabitants against fire, and to collect reasonable rates, prices, and compensation for furnishing and supplying the same.
It further appears from the record that the city of Daytona Beach, being desirous of obtaining a loan from the United States government with which to construct certain additions and improvements to the water supply system already owned and operated by it under the foregoing statutory authority, on October 9, 1934, passed an ordinance reciting that, inasmuch as it was necessary for the protection of the existing water supply system and for the preservation of the property, safety, and health of the inhabitants of the city, to construct the additions and improvements aforesaid, that the city of Daytona Beach would authorize and provide for the issue of $280,000 in negotiable water revenue certificates bearing interest at 4 per cent. per annum, payable semiannually on the 1st days of January and July of each year; said water revenue certificates to be executed and issued in substantially the following form:
'No. ----- United States of America $1,000
'State of Florida County of Volusia City of Daytona Beach
'Water Revenue Certificate
'The City of Daytona Beach, in Volusia County, State of Florida, for value received, hereby promises to pay solely from the special fund provided therefor as hereinafter set forth, to the bearer, or, if this certificate be registered as to principal, to the registered owner hereof, on the first day of January, 19--, the principal sum of one thousand dollars and to pay, from said special fund, interest thereon at the rate of 4% per annum, payable semi-annually on the first days of January and July of each year upon the presentation and surrender of the annexed interest coupons as they severally become due. Both principal and interest of this certificate are payable in lawful money of the United States at the Irving Trust Company of New York, in the City of New York, New York.
'This Certificate is one of an issue of Two Hundred Eighty Thousand Dollars ($280,000) Water Revenue Certificates, all of like date and tenor, except as to maturities, issued by said City, under an Ordinance duly adopted by the Commission of said City, for the purpose of constructing certain improvements of the water supply system of said City. Said ordinance provides that the commission of said City shall fix and maintain rates and collect charges for the facilities and services afforded by the water supply system, which will provide revenue sufficient at all times to pay the costs of operation, maintenance and repairs of such system, and also sufficient to pay into a special fund, which fund has by said ordinance been created and designated 'Water Revenue Certificates Sinking Fund,' sufficient amount of revenues over and above such costs of operation, maintenance and repairs, to provide for the payment of the interest and principal of said certificates as the same fall due.
'This certificate with interest coupons hereunto appertaining, is issued upon the following terms and conditions to all of which each taker and owner hereof and of the interest coupons consents and agrees:
Indorsements upon certificates:
'Validated and confirmed by a decree of the Circuit Court of the Seventh Judicial Circuit, in and for Volusia County, Florida, rendered on the 20th day of November 1934.
'--------,
'Clerk of the Circuit Court, Volusia County, Florida.'
Salient provisions of the ordinance above mentioned were to the effect following: (1) That the city of Daytona Beach would fix and maintain rates and collect charges for the facilities and services afforded by its water supply system sufficient at all times (a) to provide adequate revenues to pay the cost, operation, and maintenance of the system, (b) to establish and maintain a special fund sufficient to provide for payment of the principal and interest of the proposed certificates, and (c) likewise sufficient to provide a reserve fund for contingencies; (2) that the gross revenues of the water supply system would be deposited, as received, into a special account to be set aside monthly into separate and special funds to be provided and used as in said resolution prescribed for the purpose of assuring payment for the projected improvements and additions; (3) that, while any of the water revenue...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. City of Tampa
... ... enforced, as hereinbefore stated.' ... See ... State v. City of Lake City, 116 Fla. 10, 156 So ... 924; State v. City of Daytona Beach, 118 Fla. 29, ... 158 So. 300; Wilson v. City of Bartow, 124 Fla. 356, ... 168 So. 545; State v. City of Clearwater, 124 Fla ... 354, ... ...
-
State v. City of De Land
... ... 721; State v. City of Miami, ... 113 Fla. 280, 152 So. 6; State v. City of Lake City, ... 116 Fla. 10, 156 So. 924; State v. City of ... Daytona [135 Fla. 543] Beach, 118 Fla. 29, 158 ... So. 300; Herbert v. City of Daytona Beach, 121 Fla ... 212, 163 So. 565, 566; Boykin v. Town of River ... ...
-
Marvin v. Housing Authority of Jacksonville
... ... the Housing Authority of Jacksonville and the City of ... Jacksonville, the issuing of any bonds or debentures by the ... administered by the authority is exempt from all State, ... County, and Municipal ad valorem taxes under the terms and ... 10, 156 So ... 924; State v. City of Daytona Beach, 118 Fla. 29, ... 158 So. 300; Wilson v. City of Bartow, 124 ... ...
-
City of Orlando v. Evans
... ... See ... Hayes v. Walker, 54 Fla. 163, 44 So. 747; State ... v. Tampa Water Works Co., 56 Fla. 858, 47 So. 358, 19 ... L.R.A.,N.S., 183; City of Tampa v ... 6; State v. City of ... Lake City, 116 Fla. 10, 156 So. 924; State v. City ... of Daytona Beach, 118 Fla. 29, 39, 158 So. 300. The ... Utilities Commission of the City of Orlando has the ... ...