State v. Clark
Decision Date | 08 May 1894 |
Citation | 26 S.W. 562,121 Mo. 500 |
Parties | The State v. Clark, Appellant |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
[Copyrighted Material Omitted] [Copyrighted Material Omitted]
Appeal from Jackson Criminal Court. -- Hon. John W. Wofford, Judge.
With two others, defendant was indicted for the murder of one Jane Wright by choking her to death. This murder was committed for the purpose of robbery. Deceased was an aged woman, owner of an employment agency in Kansas City, Missouri, who had at the time of the murder, accumulated considerable money, which she carried around with her concealed in her clothing and about her person. Her dead body was found on the night of September 9, 1893, about 8 o'clock, in her office in Kansas City. The body, when found, was yet warm, her face beaten in with brutal blows, her hands and feet tied, her clothing torn showing where her savings and her watch had been forcibly taken from her in the uneven struggle for property and life finger marks upon her throat indicated she was strangled to death, and so it was disclosed on the post mortem.
The deed was committed by the defendant, Clark, and his codefendant, Jones. Clark, that same night and within an hour after the murder, gave the watch taken from the dead woman to a friend, who was a bartender, for safekeeping, who, as soon as he heard of the murder, became suspicious and delivered the watch to a police officer, which led to the arrest of both Clark and Jones the following morning. Both parties, after arrest, made full confessions to the chief of police in detail, admitting their guilt, which confessions were taken down in writing; afterward, both persons reiterated the same statements, both at the coroner's inquest and at their preliminary examination before the justice, their confessions being taken down in writing, subscribed and sworn to by them. This is the statement of defendant John Clark at the preliminary examination:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. McGee
... ... 4, ... 7(5), and cases cited; State v. Brennan, 164 Mo ... 487, 504, 65 S.W. 325, 329(1).] After proceeding with ... challenges to the polls, appellant was precluded from ... thereafter challenging the array, State v. Taylor, ... 134 Mo. 109, 143, 35 S.W. 92, 99(i); State v. Clark, ... 121 Mo. 500, 513, 26 S.W. 562, 566(3); and appellant's ... presentation of the issue for the first time in the motion ... for new trial failed to preserve it for review, State v ... Garrett, 285 Mo. 279, 287(4), 226 S.W. 4, 7(4); ... State v. Grant, 152 Mo. 57, 71, 53 S.W. 432, ... ...
-
The State v. Taylor
...on the panel, and had saved their exceptions to the individual jurymen; defendants can not afterward object to the whole panel. State v. Clark, 121 Mo. 513. (15) Where trial court has passed on affidavits pro and con as to alleged expressions of opinion by jurors, its finding will not be di......
-
State v. Weeden
...439. Besides, the challenge was not to the array but to the polls, and the attempted challenge to the array was thereby waived. State v. Clark, 26 S.W. 562. (3) The record although imperfectly preserved, shows the presence of the defendant during each day of the trial. A record showing the ......
-
McFern v. Gardner
... ... appellant expected to prove. Summers v. Ins. Co., 90 ... Mo.App. 691; McCormick v. St. Louis, 166 Mo. 315; ... State v. Martin, 124 Mo. 515; Hickman v ... Green, 123 Mo. 165; State v. Nocton, 121 Mo ... 537; Berthold v. O'Hara, 121 Mo. 89; ... overruled. State v. Brennan, 164 Mo. 487; State ... v. Taylor, 134 Mo. 109; State v. Clark, 121 Mo ... 500; Tarkio v. Cook, 120 Mo. 11; State v ... Sansome, 116 Mo. 1; State v. Smith, 114 Mo ... 406; State v. Brewer, 109 Mo ... ...