State v. Compton, 1526--II
| Decision Date | 09 July 1975 |
| Docket Number | No. 1526--II,1526--II |
| Citation | 13 Wn.App. 863,538 P.2d 861 |
| Parties | The STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. Patrick R. COMPTON, Appellant. |
| Court | Washington Court of Appeals |
Ward J. Rathbone, Bean, Gentry & Rathbone, Olympia, for appellant.
Henry McCleary, Deputy Pros. Atty., Patrick D. Sutherland, Pros. Atty., Olympia, for respondent.
*
Trooper Owen of the Washington State Patrol stopped a vehicle driven by appellant Compton for two minor traffic violations. The trooper testified that he detected a strong odor of marijuana coming from the vehicle as the appellant was producing his driver's license. The appellant was asked to step from the vehicle and put his hands on top of it. The officer then 'frisked' him for weapons, the search being a pat-down procedure which resulted in Trooper Owen's feeling a small round object in a right front pocket which he judged to be a film canister. When Compton put his hand down inside his shirt Trooper Owen grabbed it and the appellant came up with such a canister. Inside the canister were several small blue pills which were found to be LSD. A further search of the car revealed a pipe having a very strong odor of marijuana and a plastic bag containing a small amount of a greenish-brown vegetable substance.
Trooper Owen testified that he had received education at the Washington State Patrol Academy in the detection of controlled substances, including marijuana, both in the raw form and by being allowed to smell burning marijuana. He stated he had made numerous marijuana arrests and was familiar with its odor; also he was aware that illegal drugs are often carried in film canisters.
The question in this case is whether Trooper Owen's detection of the odor of marijuana gave him sufficient information to form a reasonable belief that the crime of unlawful possession of a controlled substance was being committed in his presence. We hold that it did and that the warrantless search in this instance was a legal search.
Authority for an arrest by a police officer in such a situation is provided by RCW 10.31.100 which provides in part:
Any police officer having information to support a reasonable belief that a person has committed or is committing a misdemeanor or gross misdemeanor, . . . involving the use or possession of cannabis shall have the authority to arrest said person: . . .
The search in this instance without a warrant was a legal search.
Although there seems to be no precedent in Washington as to whether the smell of marijuana alone is sufficient to constitute probable cause for a search, there is case authority from other states. A parallel case is People v. Wolf, 15 Ill.App.3d 374, 304 N.E.2d 512 (1973), in which officers stopped a motor vehicle for having only one headlight. They detected a strong odor of marijuana emanating from the vehicle. After arresting the occupants of the car, the officers found a cigarette believed to contain marijuana. They asked to have the trunk of the car opened and there they discovered 16 plastic bags containing a substance thought to be the drug....
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Commonwealth v. Trenge
... ... Curran, supra; United ... States v. Bowman, 487 F.2d 1229 (10th Cir.1973); ... State v. Medders, 153 Ga.App. 680, 266 S.E.2d 331 ... (1980); Miller v. State, 373 So.2d 1004 ... State, 91 ... Nev. 456, 537 P.2d 477 (1975); State v. Compton, 13 ... Wash.App. 863, 538 P.2d 861 (1975); State v ... Salcido, 22 Ariz.App. 167, 525 P.2d ... ...
-
Com. v. Trenge
...663, 119 Cal.Rptr. 500, 532 P.2d 148 (1975); A Minor Boy v. State, 91 Nev. 456, 537 P.2d 477 (1975); State v. Compton, 13 Wash.App. 863, 538 P.2d 861 (1975); State v. Salcido, 22 Ariz.App. 167, 525 P.2d 298 (1974); Rogers v. State, 131 Ga.App. 136, 205 S.E.2d 901 (1974); People v. Parisi, 4......
-
State Of Wash. v. Wright
...Marcum, 149 Wash.App. 894, 912, 205 P.3d 969 (2009); State v. Huff, 64 Wash.App. 641, 647, 826 P.2d 698 (1992); State v. Compton, 13 Wash.App. 863, 864-65, 538 P.2d 861 (1975). ¶ 36 For example in Compton, a police officer detected marijuana coming from a vehicle and frisked the lone occupa......
-
State v. Huff
...is emanating from a vehicle. 2 State v. Hammond, 24 Wash.App. 596, 600, 603 P.2d 377 (1979) (passenger); State v. Compton, 13 Wash.App. 863, 864-65, 538 P.2d 861 (1975) (driver); 2 LaFave, Search and Seizure, § 3.6(b) at 36-38 (2d ed. 1987); see also State v. Ramirez, 49 Wash.App. 814, 819,......
-
Survey of Washington Search and Seizure Law
...reh'g denied, 105 S. Ct. 51 (1984); State v. Huckaby, 15 Wash. App. 280, 549 P.2d 35 (1976); State v. Compton, 13 Wash. App. 863, 864-65, 538 P.2d 861, 861-62 (1975) (officer who recognized smell of marijuana emanating from properly stopped car had probable cause to search suspect for contr......
-
Survey of Washington Search and Seizure Law: 1988 Update
...329, 352, 610 P.2d 869, 883 (ability to identify marijuana), cert, denied, 449 U.S. 873 (1980); State v. Compton, 13 Wash. App. 863, 866, 538 P.2d 861, 862 (1975) (ability to smell and recognize marijuana). The basis of the officer's knowledge and the relevance of the knowledge to the parti......
-
Survey of Washington Search and Seizure Law: 1998 Update
...24 Wash. App. 596, 600, 603 P.2d 377, 379 (1979) (marijuana odor emanating from vehicle); State v. Compton, 13 Wash. App. 863, 864-65, 538 P.2d 861, 861-62 (1975) (smell of marijuana and discovery of greenish-brown vegetable substance was a legal warrantless search). Odor can also support w......
-
Survey of Washington Search and Seizure Law: 2005 Update
...24 Wn. App. 596, 599, 603 P.2d 377, 379 (1979) (marijuana odor emanating from vehicle); State v. Compton, 13 Wn. App. 863, 864-65, 538 P.2d 861, 861-62 (1975) (smell of marijuana and discovery of greenish-brown vegetable substance was a legal warrantless search). Odor can also support a war......