State v. Conner
Decision Date | 05 April 1920 |
Docket Number | 466. |
Citation | 103 S.E. 79,179 N.C. 752 |
Parties | STATE v. CONNER ET AL. |
Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Appeal from Superior Court, Iredell County; Adams, Judge.
Ralph Conner and Sinclair Conner were convicted of murder in the first degree, and they appeal. No error.
The fact of conspiracy in a homicide case may be collected from collateral circumstances, and it is not necessary to prove any direct act, or even any meeting of the conspirators.
The prisoners were convicted of the murder in the first degree of Lloyd Cloaninger who at the time of the killing was deputy sheriff of Iredell. The deceased under a warrant from a justice of the peace was commanded to arrest Boizy Conner and one of the prisoners, Sinclair Conner, under a charge of assault with a deadly weapon upon one Farin. On Sunday August 3, 1919, a large crowd of negroes and some whites were attending a camp meeting at Morrow's Grove, a negro church. Among these were the prisoners, Ralph Conner and Sinclair Conner, and their brother Boizy Conner, the last two being defendants in said warrant, and all three it seems armed with pistols. The deceased officer accompanied by two other officers, Furr and Broom of Mooresville, went to the camp meeting ground about 3 p. m. to serve the warrant against Sinclair Conner and Boizy Conner. Before the actual attempt to serve the warrant both of them were informed that the officers were in search of Sinclair to arrest him, and both were armed with pistols. Sinclair, inquiring where the officer was, went toward Cloaninger and asked him, "What in the hell does all this mean?" The deceased Cloaninger, having the warrant in his hand, told Sinclair "You are under arrest; be quiet," to which Sinclair replied: "No God-damned man shall arrest me!" Then crouching behind a tall black negro, he drew his pistol and opened fire upon Cloaninger. Cloaninger returned the fire. The only wound that Cloaninger seems to have received at this time was a slight one in one of his arms, whereas Sinclair Conner was so badly wounded that after dodging behind an automobile he fell at the foot of a tree some distance off. Cloaninger and the two other officers followed him to the tree, where Cloaninger was trying to ascertain the extent of Sinclair's wounds and to get a car to take him to some physician for attention. While this was going on, Boizy Conner came up and attacked Cloaninger, but without a weapon. Cloaninger used a blackjack in defending himself from the attack of Boizy. Furr and Broom, the Mooresville officers, then seized Boizy, and while they were holding him Sinclair Conner, the other defendant, breaking through the crowd which was trying to restrain him, and declaring that he would kill the damned white man who had shot his brother, came up behind Cloaninger, and fired two shots into his body. One of these shots was not fatal; the other, that which passed through Cloaninger's bowels was the cause of his death. Testimony of H. C. Furr, of Dr. Henry Long, and Johnson Gabriel.
Miles Wilson testified:
John Wally testified:
And again:
The state relies upon this evidence of Wally as particularly important under the question of conspiracy. It places the three brothers together after Sinclair had the deceased pointed out to him, and declared that he would not be arrested.
Dick Craven, after testifying in regard to the first gun firing between Sinclair and the deceased, proceeded:
The evidence is that this other negro was the prisoner, Ralph Conner. There was a verdict of guilty of murder in the first degree as to both prisoners, and the capital sentence was imposed by the judge, from which both appealed.
L. C. Caldwell, of Statesville, E. B. Jones, of Winston, and R. T. Weatherman, of Statesville, for appellants.
The Attorney General and Frank Nash, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
The prisoners declined to introduce any testimony. There...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Lawrence
...is concerned, to constitute the offense.'" State v. Smith, 237 N.C. 1, 16, 74 S.E.2d 291, 301 (1953) (quoting State v. Conner, 179 N.C. 752, 755, 103 S.E. 79, 80 (1920)). The existence of a conspiracy may be shown with direct or circumstantial evidence. See Bindyke, 288 N.C. at 616, 220 S.E......
-
State v. Gibbs
...is concerned, to constitute the offense.' " State v. Smith, 237 N.C. 1, 16, 74 S.E.2d 291, 301 (1953), quoting State v. Connor, 179 N.C. 752, 103 S.E. 79 (1920). The conspiracy is the crime and not its execution. State v. Lea, 203 N.C. 13, 164 S.E. 737[, cert. denied, 287 U.S. 649, 53 S.Ct.......
-
State v. Stewart
...There was evidence of such conspiracy, but none of repentance or withdrawal by either party before the crime was committed. State v. Connor, 179 N.C. 752, 103 S.E. 79. it is true, is not in itself an admission of guilt; but when established it is a fact which, together with a series of othe......
- State v. Ritter