State v. Conway
| Decision Date | 05 February 2009 |
| Docket Number | No. 548P08.,548P08. |
| Citation | 363 N.C. 132,673 S.E.2d 665 |
| Parties | STATE of North Carolina v. Charles James CONWAY. |
| Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Upon consideration of the petition filed by State of NC on the 16th day of December 2008 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of February 2009."
Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 16th day of December 2008 by State of NC in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of February 2009."
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State Carolina v. Lee Roy Ellison.State Carolina v. James Edward Treadway.
...relation to a valid State objective, that is, the deterrence of large scale distribution of drugs.” See also State v. Conway, 194 N.C.App. 73, 82, 669 S.E.2d 40, 46 (2008) (stating that, “if the General Assembly had chosen to define the quantity of methamphetamine needed to constitute traff......
-
State v. Privette, COA11–139.
...strained possible meaning. A criminal statute is still construed utilizing ‘common sense’ and legislative intent.”State v. Conway, 194 N.C.App. 73, 79, 669 S.E.2d 40, 44 (2008) (internal citation omitted and quoting State v. Beck, 359 N.C. 611, 614, 614 S.E.2d 274, 277 (2005)), disc. review......
-
In the Matter of N.T.
...possible meaning. A criminal statute is still construed utilizing ‘common sense’ and legislative intent.' ” State v. Conway, 194 N.C.App. 73, 79, 669 S.E.2d 40, 44 (2008) (citing State v. Hinton, 361 N.C. 207, 211, 639 S.E.2d 437, 440 (2007) (internal quotation omitted) and quoting State v.......