State v. Cook, 5D00-3749.
Decision Date | 12 October 2001 |
Docket Number | No. 5D00-3749.,5D00-3749. |
Citation | 796 So.2d 1247 |
Parties | STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Frank Walter COOK, Appellee. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Mary G. Jolley, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
James F. Cummins, Inverness, for Appellee.
The State of Florida sought the continuance of a violation of probation hearing when its sole witness, a Massachusetts' probation officer, was unable to travel to Florida to testify at the hearing due to inclement weather conditions. The trial court denied the continuance on the ground that the court had previously announced that no continuances would be granted. The court then dismissed the case sua sponte.
In order to obtain a continuance due to the unavailability of a witness, the movant must show:
(1) prior due diligence to obtain the witness's presence; (2) that substantially favorable testimony would have been forthcoming; (3) that the witness was available and willing to testify; and (4) that the denial of the continuance would cause material prejudice.
State v. J.G., 740 So.2d 84, 85 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) (citing Geralds v. State, 674 So.2d 96, 99 (Fla.1996)). The record undisputedly reveals that the State was entitled to a continuance in the instant case based on the above factors. We also find that the dismissal of the State's case sua sponte was an abuse of judicial discretion. See, e.g., State v. Lundy, 531 So.2d 1020 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988) ( ); see also State v. Pope, 675 So.2d 165 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996) ( ); State v. S.M.F., 546 So.2d 20 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989) ( ).
REVERSED.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Dixon, 4D17-481
...erred in denying the State's request for a continuance; therefore, its dismissal of the warrant was improper. See State v. Cook , 796 So.2d 1247, 1247–48 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) (holding that the trial court erred in denying the State a continuance when the State's sole witness, a probation off......
- Spires v. State
-
Smith v. State
...testimony; the witness was available and willing to testify; and material prejudice if the continuance is denied. State v. Cook, 796 So.2d 1247 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001). In the case at bar, Appellant was not prejudiced by the denial of his motion to continue. Specifically, the absence of Appella......