State v. Cox
Decision Date | 01 October 1931 |
Docket Number | 162. |
Citation | 160 S.E. 358,201 N.C. 357 |
Parties | STATE v. COX et al. |
Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Appeal from Superior Court, Pitt County; Frizzelle, Judge.
Rodman Cox and another were convicted of robbery, and they appeal.
No error.
Prosecutrix' testimony regarding time she had been accumulating money of which she was robbed held competent as affecting her credibility.
The defendants were tried on an indictment as follows:
April Term1931.
At the trial each defendant entered a plea of not guilty and relied upon an alibi as his defense.The jury returned a verdict of guilty as to both defendants.
From the judgment that each defendant be confined in the State's Prison for a term of not less than seven or more than nine years, both defendants appealed to the Supreme Court.
Harding & Lee and Gaylord & Harrell, all of Greenville, for appellants.
Dennis G. Brummitt, Atty. Gen., and A. A. F. Seawell, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
At the trial of this action, the prosecutrix, Mrs. G. H. Ballard, as a witness for the state, testified that at about 9 o'clock on the night of December 26, 1930, while she was walking alone on a public street in the town of Greenville, returning to her home from church, she was suddenly and violently assaulted by two men, who robbed her of her purse and its contents.She had in her purse, at the time she was assaulted, more than $4,250.This money, which was the property of the witness, and which she had for many years carried in her purse, was taken from her by the two men who assaulted her.After they had robbed her of her purse and its contents, the two men ran away.The witness identified the defendantElmer Whitley as one of the men who assaulted and robbed her.She testified that she had seen the defendantRodman Cox at the church a short time before the close of the services.He did not come into the church, but the witness saw him standing on the outside, looking through the window at her.She did not identify this defendant as one of the men who assaulted and robbed her.
On her direct examination by the solicitor for the state, the witness was asked the following question: The witness replied:
In apt time, defendants objected to the foregoing question and answer.Their objections were overruled, and de...
To continue reading
Request your trialUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Start Your 7-day Trial
- State v. Casey
-
State v. Hairston
...was relevant and material to support the State's theory of a conspiracy to rob and, if necessary, to kill Mr. Minor. In State v. Cox, 201 N.C. 357, 160 S.E. 358 (1931), this Court '. . . The state could not be deprived of the benefit of evidence which was relevant and material because it mi......
- State v. Litteral
- State v. Perry