State v. Craig

Decision Date15 July 1931
Docket Number13201.
Citation159 S.E. 559,161 S.C. 232
PartiesSTATE v. CRAIG.
CourtSouth Carolina Supreme Court

Appeal from Greenville County Court; M. F. Ansel, Judge.

Roy Craig was convicted on a charge of abandonment and nonsupport of his wife, and he appeals.

Affirmed.

C. S Bowen, of Greenville, for appellant.

Robert T. Ashmore, Co. Sol., of Greenville, for the State.

STABLER J.

The defendant was tried in the Greenville county court on a charge of abandonment and nonsupport of his wife. At the trial, he represented himself and was convicted and sentenced. He then employed counsel, who made a motion for a new trial, which was refused, and appeal is now made to this court.

The statute under which the conviction was had is as follows "Any able-bodied man or a man capable of earning or making a livelihood who shall, without just cause or excuse abandon or fail to supply the actual necessaries of life to his wife *** shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor ***" 1925 Statutes, p. 143.

After reading this statute to the jury and telling them that the indictment was drawn under it, the court gave the following instructions (numerals added): "(1) If you are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that this man has failed to provide for his wife and has not sufficient cause not to do so, he is guilty. (2) The evidence is for you as to whether or not he left her--if he does not treat her as a wife should be treated, she does not have to live with him. (3) A wife is required to go to the home the husband provides and he must provide it. (4) If he does not provide the necessities of life and you are so satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt you will find him guilty; if not so satisfied, you will find him not guilty."

Appellant complains that the court erred in charging (1), since this instruction excluded the defense of "excuse" given to him by the act and limited his defense to "just cause," the contention being that the latter is a higher requirement than the former.

The word "cause" means "that which occasions or effects a result"; the word ""excuse" is derived from ex causa and means "that which is offered as a reason for being excused; a plea offered in extenuation of a fault or irregular deportment; that which extenuates or justifies a fault." A cause is a state of facts from which a certain condition commonly called a result or effect, arises; an excuse is that plea or statement made by the accused which arises out of the state of facts constituting and relied on as the cause. It is quite evident that the distinction between the two words as used in the statute is largely metaphysical, and, under the testimony in this case, the failure to include "excuse" in the charge as a defense could...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • State v. Eskew
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • July 23, 1945
    ... ... duty to make his wishes known. State v. Wardlaw, 153 ... S.C. 175, 150 S.E. 614; State v. Hendrix, 86 S.C ... 64, 68, S.E. 129; State v. Chastain, 85 S.C. 64, 67 ... S.E. 6; State v. Harrell et al., 142 S.C. 24, 140 ... S.E. 258; State v. Craig, 161 S.C. 232, 159 S.E ... 559; State v. Roof, 144 S.C. 118, 142 S.E. 238; ... State v. Jacobs, 111 S.C. 283, 97 S.E. 835; ... State v. Stafford, 193 S.C. 474, 8 S.E.2d 849; ... State v. Du Rant, 87 S.C. 532, 70 S.E. 306; ... State v. Dodson, 16 S.C. 453 ...           The ... fact ... ...
  • State v. Duck
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • February 27, 1947
    ... ... requested such charge, and having failed to do so, he waived ... his right to have all of the applicable law charged ... State v. Hendrix, 86 S.C. 64, 68 S.E. 129; State ... v. Henderson, 126 S.C. 425, 120 S.E. 235; State v ... Wardlaw, 153 S.C. 175, 150 S.E. 614; and State v ... Craig, 161 S.C. 232, 159 S.E. 559. Of course, if the ... State had depended entirely upon circumstantial evidence to ... connect the appellant with the transportation of illegal ... whiskey, then the failure to charge the jury as to the rules ... governing circumstantial evidence would have ... ...
  • State v. Stafford
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • May 6, 1940
    ... ... such immunity would also extend to cases where the wife by ... force of arms causes and forces her husband to desert his ... home and his minor children ...          We see ... no error in the foregoing instruction. State v ... Craig, 161 S.C. 232, 159 S.E. 559; State v ... Lancaster, 135 S.C. 412, 133 S.E. 824; State v ... Stone, 111 S.C. 496, 98 S.E. 333. If the appellant had ... desired a fuller and more comprehensive charge, it was his ... duty to have requested it. The trial judge, immediately ... before the ... ...
  • Southern States Supply Co. v. Union Indemnity Co.
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • July 17, 1931
    ... ... Craig, of Columbia, for respondent ...          CARTER, ...          This ... action, commenced in the county court of Richland ... of said account from time to time. At least, testimony ... offered tended to prove such state of facts. Fitzharris ... purchased from the plaintiff material to be used in ... connection with contracts other than the Buck contract and, ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT