State v. Cramer, 79-1354

Decision Date09 April 1980
Docket NumberNo. 79-1354,79-1354
PartiesSTATE of Florida, Appellant, v. James CRAMER, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee and Charles Corces, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellant.

John T. Cook, South Pasadena, for appellee.

RYDER, Judge.

The State appeals dismissal of its information for possession of cocaine, pursuant to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.190(c)(4). The motion for dismissal alleged that small glass vials of cocaine were found on top of a dresser in a room in which appellant was sleeping. The residence and dresser top were shared by appellant and another. Appellant failed to preserve for appeal any objection to the State's traverse, which added the fact that a gun found next to the cocaine had been brandished by appellant shortly before police arrived on the scene.

We find these facts sufficient to set out a prima facie case to withstand a motion to dismiss. State v. Savarino, 381 So.2d 734 (Fla.2d DCA 1980). Whether the State can prove constructive possession at trial by refuting all reasonable hypotheses of innocence to this circumstantial evidence must be decided at the close of evidence. On motion to dismiss, the State need show only a prima facie case.

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings.

BOARDMAN, Acting C. J., and CAMPBELL, J., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • State v. Rudolph, 91-205
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 20 Marzo 1992
    ...by a jury. See State v. Stewart, 404 So.2d 185 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981); State v. Upton, 392 So.2d 1013 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981); State v. Cramer, 383 So.2d 254 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980), rev. denied, 388 So.2d 1111 The order granting the defendant's motion to dismiss 3 is properly reversed. 1 When the Stat......
  • State v. Jones
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 16 Septiembre 1994
    ...a motion, the state need establish only a prima facie case. State v. Pentecost, 397 So.2d 711, 712 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981); State v. Cramer, 383 So.2d 254, 254 (Fla. 2d DCA), rev. denied, 388 So.2d 1111 (Fla.1980); State v. Savarino, 381 So.2d 734, 735 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980).3 We agree with the sta......
  • State v. Upton
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 28 Enero 1981
    ...decided at the close of all the evidence. To withstand a motion to dismiss, the State need show only a prima facie case. State v. Cramer, 383 So.2d 254 (Fla.2d DCA 1980). See also Ritter v. State, 390 So.2d 168 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). The State orally traversed the key allegation of defendant'......
  • State v. Stewart, 80-1278
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 30 Septiembre 1981
    ...a prima facie case against the defendant, it should not be granted. State v. Upton, 392 So.2d 1013 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981); State v. Cramer, 383 So.2d 254 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980). The trial court assumed the defendant's version of the victim's death as "accidental" must be accepted as true, and ther......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT