State v. Crews, 63228.

Decision Date29 July 1981
Docket NumberNo. 63228.,63228.
CitationState v. Crews, 619 S.W.2d 76 (Mo. 1981)
PartiesSTATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Terry Gene CREWS, Appellant.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

Mary Kay Wefelmeyer, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

John Ashcroft, Atty. Gen., Paul Otto, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Reexamination on order of the United States Supreme Court

PER CURIAM:

This case together with several others1 was ordered reexamined in light of Albernaz v. United States,450 U.S. ___, 101 S.Ct. 1137, 67 L.Ed.2d 275(1981).Since all of the courts of appeals rulings were based upon our ruling in Sours v. State,593 S.W.2d 208(Mo. banc 1980)(Sours I) or Sours v. State,603 S.W.2d 592(Mo. banc 1980)(Sours II), the cases were all ordered transferred to this Court.Our examination of the double jeopardy issue made in light of Albernaz pursuant to the orders of the United States Supreme Court, appears in State v. Haggard,619 S.W.2d 44(Mo. banc 1981).

The original opinion filed by the Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, State v. Crews,607 S.W.2d 729(Mo.App.1980), is approved and affirmed and by reference made a part of this opinion.Sours v. State,603 S.W.2d 592(Mo. banc 1980)(Sours II), cert. denied, Missouri v. Sours,___ U.S. ___, 101 S.Ct. 953, 67 L.Ed.2d 118(1981);andState v. Haggard,619 S.W.2d 44(Mo. banc 1981).

The judgment of conviction for armed criminal action is reversed.The judgment of conviction for robbery first degree and for kidnapping is affirmed.

DONNELLY, C. J., and SEILER, WELLIVER, MORGAN, HIGGINS and BARDGETT, JJ., concur.

RENDLEN, J., concurs in part and dissents in part in separate opinion filed.

RENDLEN, Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part.

I join the majority in its affirmance of appellant's convictions for robbery first degree and for kidnapping.However, I dissent to that portion of the majority opinion reversing appellant's conviction for armed criminal action for the same reasons set forth in my dissenting opinion in State v. Haggard,619 S.W.2d 44, decided this date.

1SeeState v. Counselman,603 S.W.2d 3(Mo. App.1980);State v. McGee,602 S.W.2d 709(Mo.App.1980);State v. Payne,607 S.W.2d 822(Mo.App.1980);State v. White,610 S.W.2d 646(Mo.App.1980);State v. (Johnny) Williams,610 S.W.2d 644(Mo.App.1980), all of which were vacated and remanded to the Court of Appeals, Eastern District, in Missouri v. Counselman,___ U.S. ___, 101 S.Ct. 1690, 68 L.Ed.2d 190(1981).SeeBrown v. State,607 S.W.2d 801(Mo.App.1980);State v. Collins,607 S.W.2d 781(Mo.App.1980);State v. Hawkins,608 S.W.2d 496(Mo.App.1980);State v. (Eddie) Greer,609 S.W.2d 423(Mo.App.1980);State v. Martin,610 S.W.2d 18(Mo.App.1980), all of which were vacated and remanded to the Court of Appeals, Western District, in Missouri v. Brown,___ U.S. ___, 101 S.Ct. 1735, 68 L.Ed.2d 222(1981).SeeState v. Sinclair,606 S.W.2d 271(Mo.App.1980), vacated and remanded to the Court of Appeals, Southern District, in Missouri v. Sinclair,___ U.S. ___, 101 S.Ct. 3044, 69 L.Ed.2d 415(1981).SeeState v. Lowery,608 S.W.2d 445(Mo.App.1980), vacated and remanded to the Court of Appeals, Eastern District, in Missouri v. Lowery,___ U.S. ___, 101 S.Ct. 3044, 69 L.Ed.2d 415(1981).SeeState v. (Timothy) Crews,607 S.W.2d 759(Mo.App.1980);State v. (Terry) Crews,607 S.W.2d 729(Mo.App.1980);State v. Helton,607 S.W.2d 772(Mo.App.1980);State v. Tunstall,607 S.W.2d 809(Mo.App.1980), all of which were vacated and remanded to the Court of Appeals, Eastern District in Missouri v. Crews,___ U.S. ___, 101 S.Ct. 3103, 69 L.Ed.2d 968(1981).In all of the above cases where an application for transfer to this Court was requested, all such applications were denied.

SeeState v. (Donald) Greer,605 S.W.2d 93(Mo.1980);State v. Kendrick,606 S.W.2d 643(Mo.1980);andState v. (Rollan Anthony) Williams,606 S.W.2d 777(Mo.1980), all of which were vacated and remanded to this Court in Missouri v. Greer,___ U.S. ___, 101 S.Ct. 3000, 69 L.Ed.2d 385(1981).

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
4 cases
  • State ex rel. Bulloch v. Seier, 71012
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • May 16, 1989
    ... ... banc 1981); State v. Sinclair, 619 S.W.2d 73 (Mo. banc 1981); State v. Payne, 619 S.W.2d 75 (Mo. banc 1981); State v. Crews, 619 S.W.2d 76 (Mo. banc 1981); State v. Lowery, 619 S.W.2d 77 (Mo. banc 1981); State v. Crews, 619 S.W.2d 78 (Mo. banc 1981); State v. White, 619 ... ...
  • State v. Lee, 13092
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • October 13, 1983
    ...competency to stand trial cannot be waived by going to trial. State v. Crews, 607 S.W.2d 729 (Mo.App.1980), affirmed after remand, 619 S.W.2d 76 (Mo.1981). However, "the rights available under § 552.020 are personal to the accused who may waive them." State v. Anderson, 493 S.W.2d 681, 684 ......
  • State v. Payne, 63135.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • July 29, 1981
    ... ... Lowery, ___ U.S. ___, 101 S.Ct. 3044, 69 L.Ed.2d 415 (1981). See State v. (Timothy) Crews, 607 S.W.2d 759 (Mo.App.1980); State v. (Terry) Crews, 607 S.W.2d 729 (Mo.App.1980); State v. Helton, 607 S.W.2d 772 (Mo.App.1980); State v ... ...
  • State v. Kent, 44381
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • May 18, 1982
    ...trial court's permitting him to proceed in his chosen manner. State v. Crews, 607 S.W.2d 729, 731 (Mo.App.1980), aff'd on other grounds, 619 S.W.2d 76 (Mo.banc Defendant's final complaint concerns the trial court's refusal to allow him to expatiate on the fact that the state had not yet cha......