State v. Csri Ltd. Partnership

• Decision Date: 17 December 2001
• Docket Number: 00-10947,2
• Parties: STATE OF NEW YORK, ETC., ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. CSRI LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, ET AL., RESPONDENTS. 2000-10947 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION: SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT Argued -
• Court: New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

STATE OF NEW YORK, ETC., ET AL., APPELLANTS v CSRI LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, ET AL., RESPONDENTS

2000-10947

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

APPELLATE DIVISION: SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT

Argued - December 4, 2001

December 17, 2001

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General, New York, N.Y. (Michael S. Belohlavek and Carter H. Strickland, Jr., of counsel), for appellants.

Sive, Paget & Riesel, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Steven C. Russo, Mark A. Chertok, and Hilary Semel of counsel), for respondents.

DECISION & ORDER

David S. Ritter, J.P.

William D. Friedmann

Sandra J. Feuerstein

Stephen G. Crane, JJ.

In an action, inter alia, for injunctive relief, the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Floyd, J.), entered October 19, 2000, which, upon an order of the same court, dated September 11, 2000, denying their motion for summary judgment and granting the defendants' cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as time-barred, is in favor of the defendants and against them dismissing the complaint.

ORDERED that the judgment is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof dismissing the complaint in its entirety and substituting therefor a provision dismissing the complaint to the extent that it is based on acts and/or omissions occurring more than three years before the commencement of the action; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, with costs to the plaintiffs, those branches of the plaintiffs' motion which were for summary judgment are granted to the extent the complaint is based on acts and/or omissions which occurred within three years before the commencement of the action, and the motion is otherwise denied, those branches of the cross motion which are to dismiss the complaint to the extent it is based on acts and/or omissions which occurred more than three years before the commencement of the action are granted, and the cross motion is otherwise denied, the order dated September 11, 2000, is modified accordingly, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, for further proceedings consistent herewith, and for entry of an appropriate amended judgment.

The defendant CSRI Limited Partnership (hereinafter CSRI) owns property within the Central Pine Barrens Special Groundwater Protection Area of Long Island upon which it operates a shooting range. The defendant George Schmelzer is a current partner of CSRI and the former owner/operator of the shooting range, and the defendant Inge Schmelzer is a general and limited partner of CSRI. After investigations, the plaintiff New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (hereinafter DEC) concluded that large amounts of construction and demolition debris and some other solid waste, including discarded tires, had been placed upon the property. The construction and demolition debris was used to create or build up berms around the shooting areas. The State of New York and the DEC thereafter commenced this action alleging, inter alia, that the presence of such debris and waste upon the property rendered it a "solid waste management facility" and a "landfill" within the meaning of Environmental Conservation Law article 27 and the DEC's solid waste regulations (see, 6 NYCRR part 360) and that the facility/landfill was being owned and/or operated without a permit and in violation of the Environmental Conservation Law and DEC regulations. The plaintiffs sought, inter alia, injunctive relief compelling the defendants to close and remediate the site, and the imposition of civil penalties. After issue was joined, the plaintiffs moved for summary judgment and the defendants cross-moved to dismiss the complaint as time-barred. The Supreme Court denied the motion and granted the cross motion. We modify.

In...