State v. Curran
| Decision Date | 31 March 1853 |
| Citation | 18 Mo. 320 |
| Parties | THE STATE, Respondent, v. CURRAN, Appellant. |
| Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
1. The indictment charged that the defendant assaulted “Silas Melville,” with intent to kill. The proof was that the name of the person assaulted was “Melvin.” Held, this was such a variance as that the court should have directed an acquittal.
Appeal from St. Louis Criminal Court.
Blennerhassett & Shreve, for appellant.
H. A. Clover, (circuit attorney,) for the State.
1. The defendant, Curran, was indicted for an assault upon Silas Melville, with intent to kill. Upon the trial, the party injured was examined as a witness, and testified that his name was “Melvin” and not “Melville.” It was objected that this was a variance, there being no evidence that the person injured was known by the name of Melvin. The court refused to decide that there was a variance between the evidence and the indictment, but instructed the jury thus: “As to whether there is a material variance in the sound of the name of the person alleged in the indictment to have been stabbed, and the name of the person proven to have stabbed is a question of fact for the jury, but the jury ought not to acquit on the ground of difference in the sound of said names, unless they believe the difference in the sound to be so great, that they cannot be reasonably taken to designate the same individual.”
When a question arises in the progress of a criminal trial, in relation to the name of the person upon whose property or person the offense has been committed, and the evidence varies from the averment in the indictment, as in this case, by proving that the individual was named Melvin, and not Melville, as alleged, it is the duty of the court to direct an acquittal, unless there is evidence in the case, showing that the person was known by the name stated in the indictment. The two names do not sound alike, and it can only be by evidence, showing that the individual was known by the name in the indictment, that the jury can have the case committed to them. As there was no evidence in the present case that the person injured was known by the name of “Melville,” and no evidence of any peculiar pronunciation of the name, different from the natural sound of the letters composing it, it was the duty of the court to tell the jury that there was such a variance as to require an acquittal. The averment of the jury to a particular individual, is descriptive of...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State ex rel. Lane v. Corneli
...are known; to obviate this, they should be named as they are generally called in society." [State v. Martin, 10 Mo. 391, 392; State v. Curran, 18 Mo. 320, 321.] think it is apparent, therefore, that if we considered the matter, as presented by the parties, we would still come back to the sa......
-
Griffin v. Franklin
... ... Sec ... 9304, R. S. 1899. (b) But even if the law should be construed ... to require the judgment to state the amount for each year, ... failure to comply with the provision would not affect the ... title of the purchaser at the tax sale. Jones v ... Ervin, ... and the names are not idem sonans. Chamberlain v ... Blodgett, 96 Mo. 482; State v. Curran, 18 Mo ... 320; Robson v. Thomas, 55 Mo. 581; Simonson v ... Dolan, 114 Mo. 176; Greer v. Lumber & Mining ... Co., 134 Mo. 185. (8) The ... ...
-
Kronski v. Missouri Pacific Ry. Co.
...in the circuit court upon defendant's motion. Robson v. Thomas, 55 Mo. 581; State v. Hardy, 21 Mo. 498; Cato v. Hutson, 7 Mo. 142; State v. Curran, 18 Mo. 320. Rathbun & Shewalter for respondent. WINSLOW, C. This is an action for damages under the 43rd section of the Corporation Act, for ki......
-
Jackson v. State
...241; 33 Id., 107; 18 Ill. 52; 5 Taunt., 814; 63 Ala. 83; 57 Iowa 58; 61 Ind. 447; 2 Tex. App., 228; 7 S.C. 469; 10 East, 83; 1 Morris, 141; 18 Mo. 320; 67 127; 28 Ala. 53; 24 Ill. 692; 7 Blackf., 324; 3 Brews., 350; 65 Ind. 460; 57 Id., 109; 61 Id., 447; 4 Tex. 228; 1 Chitty, 216; Addison, ......