State v. Currie, 425.
| Decision Date | 23 May 1934 |
| Docket Number | No. 425.,425. |
| Parties | STATE . v. CURRIE et al. |
| Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Appeal from Superior Court, New Hanover County; Cranmer, Judge.
Gordon Currie and others were convicted of an offense, and they appeal.
Appeal dismissed.
L. Clayton Grant and W. L. Parmer, both of Wilmington, for appellants.
Dennis G. Brummitt, Atty. Gen., and A. A. F. Seawell and T. W. Bruton, Asst. Attys. Gen., for the State.
This is a criminal action tried in the superior court of New Hanover county. The defendants were convicted by the jury and appealed to this court from the judgment of said court. The record proper filed in this court is fatally defective, for the reason (1) that no indictment appears therein; and (2) that the assignments of error appearing in the case on appeal are not in compliance with the rules of this court.
There is a statement in the record, signed by the solicitor for the state and counsel for defendants, to the effect that since the trial of the action, the papers in the case have disappeared from the office of the clerk of the superior court, and cannot be found, but that an indictment in due form charging the defendants with conspiracy and robbery was in the record at the time of the trial. This statement is not sufficient. It was the duty of the defendants to see that the indictment appeared in the record, or, if lost, ' to apply to the superior court for an order that a copy be supplied. See State v. McDraughon, 16S N. C. 131, 83 S. E. 181.
The assignments of error are defective for the reason that they do not include the exceptions on which they are founded. It is not sufficient merely to refer to the exceptions as they appear in the case on appeal. Rule 19(3).
The appeal is dismissed on the authority of Pruitt v. Wood, 199 N. c. 788, 156 S. E. 126.
Dismissed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Gray
...273 S.E.2d 708, 711 (1981); State v. Hunter, 245 N.C. 607, 609, 96 S.E.2d 840, 841 (1957) (per curiam); State v. Currie, 206 N.C. 598, 599, 174 S.E. 447, 447 (1934) (per curiam). In this case, it is not necessary to enforce this The transcript reveals that the judge and the clerk examined t......
-
State v. Jenkins
...of court, bill, warrant or verdict; State v. Dry, 224 N.C. 234, 29 S.E.2d 698, dismissed for failure to show warrant; State v. Currie, 206 N.C. 598, 174 S.E. 447, dismissed for failure to supply lost indictment; State v. Golden, 203 N.C. 440, 166 S.E. 311, dismissed for failure to show orga......
-
State v. Gunter
...transmitted to the Supreme Court. Payne v. Brown, 205 N.C. 785, 172 S.E. 348; State v. Frizell, 111 N.C. 722, 16 S.E. 409; State v. Currie, 206 N.C. 598, 174 S.E. 447; State v. McDraughon, 168 N.C. 131, 83 S.E. The holding in Spence v. Tapscott, 92 N.C. 576 (as stated in first headnote), wa......
-
State v. Harvell
...case the appeal is fatally defective for the reason that it contains no bill of indictment. State v. Hunter, supra; State v. Currie, 206 N.C. 598, 174 S.E. 447 (1934); State v. Dobbs, 234 N.C. 560, 67 S.E.2d 751 (1951); State v. Jenkins, 234 N.C. 112, 66 S.E.2d 819 (1951). It was the duty o......