State v. Dale
Decision Date | 04 June 1920 |
Docket Number | No. 21970.,21970. |
Citation | 222 S.W. 763,282 Mo. 663 |
Parties | STATE v. DALE. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, St. Charles County; Edgar B. Woolfolk, Judge.
Virgil Dale was convicted of robbery on plea of guilty, and after the overruling of his motion for new trial he appeals. Reversed and remanded.
Defendant pleaded guilty in the circuit court of St. Charles county to an information charging him with robbery in the first degree, in that defendant feloniously took $7 from the person of one Frank J. Bull, by force and violence to his person. Thereupon the court sentenced defendant to five years' imprisonment in the state penitentiary. At the time the plea of guilty was entered defendant was not represented by counsel, but afterwards, and within four days, defendant appeared by counsel and filed a motion for a new trial, setting up as a ground that he had entered a plea of guilty upon a promise that he would be paroled by the court. Testimony was heard by the court upon this motion and the motion was overruled. Defendant thereafter duly perfected an appeal to this court.
The evidence heard upon the motion `for a new trial was as follows:
"`On the morning of the 18th of March (this was the day that Virgil's trial came up) I had a talk with Mr. Hensler, and he said the judge would be in on the 10:48 train, he supposed, and that we could see him; but Mr. Hensler said that he would see the judge and that everything would be all right, and I just relied on what Hensler said and did not get a lawyer for Virgil.' "Synopsis of Testimony of Mrs. Allie Jacobsen.
To continue reading
Request your trial- State ex rel. Kansas City Public Service Co. v. Shain
-
State v. Kellar
...The trial court erred in refusing to grant appellant leave to withdraw his plea of guilty. State v. Stephens, 71 Mo. 535; State v. Dale, 222 S.W. 763, 282 Mo. 663; State v. Abel, 8 S.W.2d 55; Moody Riechow, 38 Wash. 303, 80 P. 461; Krolage v. People, 224 Ill. 456, 79 N.E. 570; State v. Ferr......
-
State v. Hamilton
...sound discretion of trial court. State v. Keller, 55 S.W.2d 972; State v. Richardson, 98 Mo. 567; State v. Stephens, 71 Mo. 535; State v. Dale, 282 Mo. 663. C. Cooley and Westhues, CC., concur. OPINION BOHLING Roy E. Hamilton and Dave Eddy, alias Eddie Gayman, were charged with the murder, ......
-
The State v. Meyer
... ... was not voluntary, and such ruling of this court was the law ... of this case on this trial, and said confession should not ... have been admitted in evidence in the trial of this case ... State v. Meyer, 222 S.W. 765; State v ... Dale, 282 Mo. 663; State v. Powell, 266 Mo ... 100. (4) The State was permitted, on cross-examination, over ... appellant's objection, to examine the appellant on ... matters not brought out in the examination in chief, which ... matters were highly prejudicial and hurtful to appellant. R ... S ... ...