State v. Danskin

Decision Date10 September 1982
Docket NumberNo. 81-187,81-187
Citation122 N.H. 817,451 A.2d 396
PartiesThe STATE of New Hampshire v. Allan P. DANSKIN.
CourtNew Hampshire Supreme Court

Gregory H. Smith, Atty. Gen. (Peter W. Mosseau, Asst. Atty. Gen., on the brief and orally), for the State.

Donald C. Koury, Lebanon, by brief and orally, for defendant.

BATCHELDER, Justice.

After a trial by jury resulting in a verdict of guilty of arson against the defendant, Allan P. Danskin, in connection with a fire at the Canaan, New Hampshire Elementary School, this appeal was taken from rulings by Johnson, J., and is limited to the following two questions: (1) was the evidence sufficient to support the defendant's conviction, and (2) did the trial court err in refusing to voir dire the jury concerning possible prejudice resulting from possible exposure to a newspaper account of the trial? We affirm.

As this court has stated in State v. Martin, 121 N.H. 1032, 1033-34, 437 A.2d 308, 309 (1981), "[i]n determining the sufficiency of the evidence, we follow the test set forth in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979), that the evidence is insufficient if 'no rational trier of fact could have found proof of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.' " (Citations omitted.) See State v. Glidden, 122 N.H. 41, ---, 441 A.2d 728, 733 (1982). Circumstantial evidence may support a conviction if it excludes all other rational conclusions. State v. Bird, 122 N.H. 10, ---, 440 A.2d 441, 444-45 (1982). Against these rules, we must closely analyze the facts before the trial court giving rise to this appeal.

On the evening of January 15, 1980, the Canaan Elementary School building was destroyed by fire. The evidence presented to the court during the State's case in chief demonstrated that the fire originated in the older, wood-framed section of the building. A condition of exfoliation of the underlying concrete sub-floor was attributed by the experts to the presence of a volatile accellerant, causing intense heat. This condition, known as spalling, was primarily located in a corridor or hallway which joined the older, wood-framed section with a more recent addition to the building. The possibility of electrical malfunction was disproved by the experts as a result of an examination of the fuse panel and related wiring. In an out-of-court statement introduced by the prosecution, the defendant claimed to have first become aware of the fire when he observed smoke entering the gymnasium where he was working. This statement is significant in that it tends to undercut any inference that the fire may have been started by the defendant accidentally or merely carelessly.

There was evidence that the defendant was the only person present in the building at the time the fire started. The prosecution introduced testimony that no one else was in the building at that time and that the building was secure from...

To continue reading

Request your trial
17 cases
  • Flanagan v. Prudhomme
    • United States
    • New Hampshire Supreme Court
    • June 15, 1994
    ... ... See State v. Hermsdorf, 135 N.H. 360, 365-66, 605 A.2d 1045, 1048 (1992) ...         We will not disturb the trial court's ruling on the ... ...
  • State v. Pockert, 8126-5-III
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • December 8, 1987
    ...U.S. 928, 103 S.Ct. 2088, 77 L.Ed.2d 299 (1983); Commonwealth v. Jones, 373 Mass. 423, 367 N.E.2d 631, 634 (1977); State v. Danskin, 122 N.H. 817, 451 A.2d 396, 397-98 (1982); Trombley v. Langlois, 91 R.I. 328, 163 A.2d 25, 29 ...
  • State v. Pugliese, 81-224
    • United States
    • New Hampshire Supreme Court
    • December 30, 1982
    ...its sound discretion and that absent an abuse of discretion, its decision will not be overturned by this court. State v. Danskin, 122 N.H. 817, ---, 451 A.2d 396, 398 (1982); State v. Donovan, 120 N.H. 603, 606, 419 A.2d 1102, 1104 (1980). In this case, the trial court instructed the jury t......
  • State v. Gruber, 87-491
    • United States
    • New Hampshire Supreme Court
    • August 9, 1989
    ...evidence that excludes all other rational conclusions." Murray, 129 N.H. at 650, 531 A.2d at 327 (citing State v. Danskin, 122 N.H. 817, 818, 451 A.2d 396, 397 (1982)). The defendant asserts that the State failed to meet its burden of proving the crime of theft by deception because there wa......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT