State v. Davis
| Decision Date | 20 January 1994 |
| Docket Number | No. 81870,81870 |
| Parties | 19 Fla. L. Weekly S40 STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Charles A. DAVIS, Respondent. |
| Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., James W. Rogers, Bureau Chief--Crim. Appeals and Sonya Roebuck Horbelt, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for petitioner.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Asst. Public Defender, Chief, Appellate Div., Tallahassee, for respondent.
We review Davis v. State, 617 So.2d 1139, 1140 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993), in which the district court certified the following question as being of great public importance:
Does a sentencing disposition which includes combined sanctions of county jail incarceration and community control constitute a departure sentence, when the combined periods of incarceration and community control do not exceed the maximum period of incarceration permitted by the guidelines?
Our jurisdiction is predicated on article V, section 3(b)(4), Florida Constitution. We answer the question in the affirmative and approve the decision under review.
Davis' sentencing guidelines scoresheet yielded a total of sixty points with a recommended sentencing range of community control or twelve to thirty months of incarceration. The permitted sanctions for his score ranged from any nonstate prison sanction to three and one-half years' incarceration. The trial court imposed a sentence of one year in county jail, one year of community control to follow the incarceration, and four years' probation after Davis served the year of community control. On appeal the district court held the combination of incarceration and community control to be a departure sentence and that the trial court should have provided written reasons for that departure.
In State v. VanKooten, 522 So.2d 830, 830-31 (Fla.1988), this Court decided "that when the presumptive guideline sentence directs community control or incarceration, the imposition of both represents a departure from the sentencing guidelines, requiring proper written reasons for the departure." Additionally, in State v. Mestas, 507 So.2d 587 (Fla.1987), we held that community control is not a nonstate prison sentence and that community control as a condition of probation is a departure sentence requiring written reasons to support its imposition. In Ewing v. State, 526 So.2d 1029 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988), the district court affirmed a combined sentence of twenty-four months' incarceration followed by six months of community control because the total was less than the permitted sentencing range of twelve to thirty months' incarceration. Similarly, in Tillman v. State, 555 So.2d 940 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990), and Distefano v. State, 526 So.2d 110 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988), the courts held that county jail time coupled with community control did not constitute departure sentences for which written reasons were required. Ewing, Tillman, and Distefano attempted to distinguish VanKooten, but we find that effort unavailing.
Paragraph (d)(8) of the commission notes to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701 defines "any nonstate prison sanction" as "any lawful term of probation...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Blair v. State
...the imposition of both represents a departure from the guidelines and requires proper written reasons. Accord State v. Davis, 630 So.2d 1059 (Fla.1994). In effect, defendant urges us to extend the holding in VanKooten to apply to a sentence such as he received. We disagree that VanKooten co......
-
Parker v. State
...nor the fact that the length of the sentence was within the maximum allowed by general law, cures the illegal sentence. See State v. Davis, 630 So.2d 1059 (Fla.1994) (disapproving Distefano v. State, 526 So.2d 110 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Tillman v. State, 555 So.2d 940 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); Ewi......
-
Dumas v. State
...it was a departure from the sentencing guidelines and no reason was given for the departure, we vacate the sentence. State v. Davis, 630 So.2d 1059 (Fla.1994). The requirement to pay money to "First Step" is error. Fyler v. State, 645 So.2d 108 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); McLeod v. State, 645 So.2......
-
Brooks v. State, 94-1347
...A. Brooks appeals his sentences, contending that the trial court's departure from the sentencing guidelines violates State v. Davis, 630 So.2d 1059 (Fla.1994) (sentencing disposition which imposes sanctions of county jail and community control constitutes departure sentence requiring contem......
-
"She said what?": what to do in civil domestic violence proceedings with child hearsay.
...description of the act). (14) Cf. Distefano v. State, 526 So. 2d 110 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988), overruled on other grounds, State v. Davis, 630 So. 2d 1059 (Fla. 1994) (agreeing that there was sufficient evidence of reliability of the hearsay statements as, among other things, the child was still......