State v. Day
Citation | 12 S.W. 365,100 Mo. 242 |
Parties | STATE v. DAY. |
Decision Date | 18 November 1889 |
Court | United States State Supreme Court of Missouri |
1. On a prosecution for perjury by one who swore on a trial for rape that he witnessed the act, and that the prosecutrix voluntarily yielded, it appeared that the prosecutrix was examined by physicians, at the instance of her father, to determine whether she had been in the habit of having sexual intercourse. Held, that evidence that the prosecutrix appeared to understand the nature of the examination, and that she made no objection, was objectionable as hearsay.
2. The indictment charged that defendant swore that he was on the road; that M. asked him to wait and see what took place; that M. then made indecent proposals to the prosecutrix in the rape case; that she objected, and said, if he would go home with her, she would consent; and that they then had sexual intercourse, — each of which statements the indictment alleged to be untrue, etc. Held, that an instruction that if an assault was committed, and defendant swore an assault was not committed, yet he could not be convicted, unless defendant also swore to every fact as alleged, was properly refused, as requiring the state to prove too much.
3. Under Rev. St. Mo. 1879, § 1418, providing that "every person who shall willfully and corruptly swear," etc., the omission of the word "willfully" is fatal to an indictment.
4. The question whether certain fugitives from justice could probably be obtained as witnesses in a criminal case by the next term of court rests in the sound discretion of the trial court, and, unless an abuse of discretion is shown, a refusal to grant a continuance to procure such witnesses will not be disturbed.
5. Where defendant in a criminal case is a witness, evidence as to his general reputation or character for morality is admissible.
6. Instructions to which no exceptions are saved will not be reviewed in a criminal case.
Appeal from circuit court, Cedar county; CHARLES G. BURTON, Judge.
The indictment upon which the defendant was convicted, omitting immaterial portions, was as follows: That it then and there became and was a material question whether the said James Messick had assaulted said Margaret A. Lusk with intent her to rape and carnally know. That the said Frank Day, then and there in the trial of said issue upon said preliminary examination, upon his oath aforesaid, feloniously, corruptly, and falsely, before the justice of the peace aforesaid, did depose and swear in substance, and to the effect following, that is to say: etc. The court refused to instruct the jury on behalf of defendant as follows: "The court instructs the jury that, even though they may believe from the evidence that on the 2d day of May, 1885, James Messick assaulted Margaret Lusk with intent to commit a rape upon her, and that, at the time and place mentioned in the indictment, the defendant testified as a witness, and swore that the said James Messick did not make any such assault, and though they may believe from the evidence that such evidence was untrue, yet they cannot convict the defendant unless they further believe from the evidence that the defendant also, at the same time, testified that he was on the road on the 2d day of May, 1885, and that James Messick asked her to do it, and she objected, and said if he would go home with her he might have it, and that they laid down and done it, (meaning thereby that they had sexual intercourse with one another,) and that the said testimony was also untrue." And to such refusal the defendant excepted. And the court also refused to continue the cause till the next term for reasons hereafter given.
Buller & Loy, for appellant. The Attorney General, for the State.
SHERWOOD, J., (after stating the facts as above.)
1. The indictment was based upon section 1418, Rev. St. 1879, which declares that "every person who shall willfully and corruptly swear," etc. The word "willfully" was omitted from the indictment, and this renders it bad, under the following authorities: Lembro v. Hamper, Cro. Eliz. 147; Anon., Id. 201; 2 Chit. Crim. Law, 312, 315, 316; 1 Chit. Crim. Law, 241; 2 Whart. Crim. Law, §§ 1245, 1286; Whart. Crim. Pl. (9th Ed.) §§ 235, 264, 269; State v. Carland, 3 Dev. 114; State v. Davis, 84 N. C. 787; State v. Webb, 41 Tex. 67; State v. Delue, 1 Chand. 166; Juaraqui v. State, 28 Tex. 626; 1 Archb. Crim. Pr. & Pl. 286; 2 Bish. Crim. Law, § 1046, and cases cited; State v. Morse, 1 G. Greene, 503. And the concluding words of the indictment did not remedy the defect aforesaid. State v. Herrell, 97 Mo. 105, 10 S. W. Rep. 387; 5 Bac. Abr. p. 90, (H,) tit. "Indictment;" 3 Russ. Crimes, 36; King v. Lara, 2 Leach, 647; 2 Hawk. P. C. c. 25, § 110, p. 354.
2. It is insisted there was error in refusing to grant a continuance. At a previous term there had been a mistrial, at which time, under the practice then prevailing, an affidavit for continuance was filed, and read in evidence, which affidavit was based upon the absence of Evans and Messick, the latter of...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Brinkley, 39484.
...Wharton, Criminal Law (12 Ed.), Sec. 1569; Regina v. Yates, 12 Cox Cr. Cas. 233; Cf. innuendoes in State v. Day, 100 Mo. l.c. 245, 12 S.W. 365. (25) The information attempted to assigned perjury by denials consisting of negatives pregnant and quibbles, thereby confessing the main issue. The......
-
State v. Brinkley
...The Faulkner case holds an information should inform the accused wherein and to what extent his alleged statements were false. And in the Day the indictment did contain three innuendoes. What we have said in the second, third and fourth preceding paragraphs disposes of appellant's contentio......
- State v. Branch
-
State v. Clinkingbeard
...180 Mo. 342, 79 S.W. 401; State v. Faulkner, 175 Mo. l. c. 546, 75 S.W. 116; State v. Williams, 152 Mo. 115, 53 S.W. 424; State v. Day, 100 Mo. l. c. 242, 12 S.W. 365; State v. Wakefield, 73 Mo. 549; Allan v. States, 194 Fed. l. c. 664, 39 L.R.A. (N.S.) 385; Teague v. Commonwealth, 189 S.W.......