State v. Deal, 651.
Decision Date | 12 December 1934 |
Docket Number | No. 651.,651. |
Citation | 207 N.C. 448,177 S.E. 332 |
Parties | STATE. v. DEAL. |
Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Appeal from Superior Court, Robeson County; Cranmer, Judge.
William (Bunk) Deal was convicted of murder in the first degree, and he appeals. No error.
Criminal prosecution tried upon indictment charging the defendant with the murder of one Lewis Chavis.
The record discloses that on the night of December 23, 1933, the defendant shot and killed Lewis Chavis as he was approaching his home in Robeson county, having first armed himself and made preparations for the shooting.
J. H. Godfrey, rural policeman, arrived upon the scene soon after the. shooting.
The defendant interposed a plea of self-defense, and offered evidence tending to show a quarrel and threats on the part of the deceased.
Verdict: Guilty of murder in the first degree.
Judgment: Death by electrocution.
The defendant appeals, assigning errors.
F. D. Hackett, Jr., of Lumberton, for appellant.
Dennis G. Brummitt, Atty. Gen., and A. A. F. Seawell and T. W. Bruton, Asst. Attys. Gen., for the State.
The defendant's first exception is to the refusal of the court to quash the bill of indictment on the ground that his wife was examined as a witness before the grand jury. It likewise appears that five other witnesses were examined by the grand jury.
Speaking to the question in State v. Moore, 204 N. C. 545, 168 S. E. 842, 844, Connor, J., delivering the opinion of the court, epitomized the law on the subject as follows:
The dying declaration of the deceased was correctly admitted in evidence, proper predicate having been laid for its introduction. State v. Beal, 199 N. C. 278, 154 S. E. 604; State v....
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Anderson
... ... of hope, or by the torture of fear, comes in such ... questionable shape as to merit no consideration ... [182 S.E. 651] ... State ... v. Livingston, supra; State v. Patrick, 48 N.C. 443 ... Speaking ... to the subject in ... their testimony as if they were disinterested. State v ... Lee, 121 N.C. 544, 28 S.E. 552; State v. Deal, ... 207 N.C. 448, 177 S.E. 332 ... Again, ... the defendants complain because the trial court did not ... caution the ... ...
-
State v. Rhinehart
...the jury believe that such witnesses have sworn the truth, then they are entitled to as full credit as any other witness." State v. Deal, 207 N.C. 448, 177 S.E. 332; v. Beal, 199 N.C. 278, 154 S.E. 604; State v. Ray, 195 N.C. 619, 143 S.E. 143; State v. Beavers, 188 N.C. 595, 125 S.E. 258; ......
-
State v. Rhinehart
...the jury believe that such witnesses have sworn the truth, then they are entitled to as full credit as any other witness." State v. Deal, 207 N.C. 448, 177 S.E. 332; State v. Bcal, 199 N.C. 278, 154 S.E. 604; State v. Ray, 195 N.C. 619, 143 S.E. 143; State v. Beavers, 188 N.C. 595, 125 S.E.......
-
State v. Dee
...206 N.C. 691, 175 S.E. 122; State v. Rhinehart, 209 N.C. 150, 183 S.E. 388. Cf. State v. Davis, 209 N.C. 242, 183 S.E. 420; State v. Deal, 207 N.C. 448, 177 S.E. 332. It provided by C.S. § 1799 that a person charged with the commission of a crime shall, at his own request but not otherwise,......