State v. Deberry, 39232
Citation | 215 N.W.2d 73,191 Neb. 445 |
Decision Date | 07 March 1974 |
Docket Number | No. 39232,39232 |
Parties | STATE of Nebraska, Appellee, v. Earl E. DeBERRY, Appellant. |
Court | Supreme Court of Nebraska |
Syllabus by the Court
In the absence of a proper bill of exceptions, any assignment of error that requires an examination of evidence cannot prevail on appeal.
Appeal from District Court, Douglas County; Caniglia, Judge.
Earl E. DeBerry, pro se.
Clarence A.H. Meyer, Atty.Gen., Harold S. Salter, Deputy Atty.Gen., Lincoln, for appellee.
Heard before WHITE C.J., BOSLAUGH, McCOWN, NEWTON, and CLINTON, JJ., and COLWELL and WARREN, District Judges.
In this post conviction action the defendant alleges by way of conclusions that he was denied While there are allegations of fact to support these statements of conclusions in the pleadings and, although the record shows that a hearing was held, there is no bill of exceptions in this post conviction case. The pleadings do not afford a basis for granting relief and there is no evidence before the court by which any factual issue could be reviewed. In the absence of a proper bill of exceptions, any assignment of error requiring an examination of evidence cannot prevail on appeal.
The judgment of the District Court is correct and is affirmed.
Affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Deberry v. Wolff, 74-1975
...filed by DeBerry so that "any assignment of error requiring an examination of evidence cannot prevail on appeal." State v. DeBerry, 191 Neb. 445, 215 N.W.2d 73, 74 (1974). Turning to the federal courts, DeBerry then filed this petition seeking habeas corpus relief. He raises the same claims......