State v. Dennis
| Decision Date | 03 May 1976 |
| Docket Number | No. KCD,KCD |
| Citation | 537 S.W.2d 652 |
| Parties | STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Kenneth Ray DENNIS, Appellant. 27690. |
| Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Richard J. Yocum, Asst. Public Defender, St. Joseph, for appellant.
John C. Danforth, Atty. Gen., Charles L. Howard, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.
Before TURNAGE, P.J., and WELBORN and HIGGINS, Special Judges.
Direct appeal following a guilty plea to a charge of rape. A sentence of ten years to run consecutively to a prior conviction was imposed.
On this appeal defendant raises two questions: (1) that a plea of guilty to the rape of the same woman in another county subjected defendant to double jeopardy for the same occurrence and since rape is a continuing offense, defendant was charged with the same offense, and (2) because of a delay of sixteen months from the date of the offense until the indictment was returned, defendant was denied his right to a speedy trial. Affirmed.
The courts of this State do not sanction a general right to appeal from a plea of guilty. State v. Cody, 525 S.W.2d 333, 335(6, 7) (Mo. banc 1975). It is also stated in Cody: '(w)e do not disturb the rule in Missouri that a plea of guilty voluntarily and understandingly made waives all non-jurisdictional defects and defenses.' 525 S.W.2d 333, 335(6, 7). See also Kansas City v. Stricklin, 428 S.W.2d 721, 728(8, 9) (Mo. banc 1968). However, the plea of double jeopardy does raise a jurisdictional question which may be considered on direct appeal following a guilty plea. State v. Cody, supra.
The claim made by defendant is that rape is a continuing offense. The defendant would seem to be urging that if a person is once convicted of rape he could never thereafter be tried for the rape of the same woman. This, of course, is completely untenable.
Generally rape is not a continuing offense, but each act of intercourse constitutes a distinct and separate offense. 75 C.J.S. Rape § 4. In a very similar situation the claim of a continuing offense was rejected in Mikell v. State, 242 Ala. 298, 5 So.2d 825 (1942). There the court held a prosecution for rape in one county was not barred by a previous acquittal on a charge of rape on the same woman a short time earlier in another county.
Here the previous assault upon which the defendant bases his claim of double jeopardy occurred in Atchison County, Missouri. The record does not disclose the precise times involved, but it does show an admission by the defendant that he kidnapped his victim and after two assaults, tied her up and put her in the back seat of his car. He then drove to Platte County, Missouri, where the assault to which he pled guilty in this case took place. This court can take judicial notice of the distance between Platte County and Atchison County to ascertain the distance is approximately seventy miles. It is thus apparent there was some time interval between the occurrence in Atchison County and that in Platte County.
No case has been cited in which a Missouri court has decided the question raised by defendant as to whether multiple assaults resulting in rape constitute multiple crimes or but a single crime. Independent research also fails to locate any Missouri authority on this subject. In addition to the statement in C.J.S. and Mikell the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals confronted this problem in Lillard v. State, 528 S.W.2d 207, 210(1, 2) (Tenn.Cr.App.1975). The court in Lillard discussed this problem and in so doing stated at 528 S.W.2d 211(3):
...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Boozer
...559, 264 N.W.2d 58 (1978); State v. Davis, 624 S.W.2d 72 (Mo.App.1981); Vaughan v. State, 614 S.W.2d 718 (Mo.App.1981); State v. Dennis, 537 S.W.2d 652 (Mo.App.1976); State v. Bussiere, 118 N.H. 659, 392 A.2d 151 (1978); State v. Ware, 53 Ohio App.2d 210, 372 N.E.2d 1367 (1977); Com. v. Rom......
-
Harrell v. State
...by the commencement of a sexual connection, and proof of emission is not required."42 See note 17, Supra.43 528 S.W.2d at 211.44 537 S.W.2d 652 (Mo.App.1976).45 Id. at 654. The Dennis court in support of this proposition cited 75 C.J.S. Rape § 4 (1952) and Mikell v. State, 242 Ala. 298, 5 S......
-
State v. Fuller
...single criminal goal may be effectuated by multiple criminal acts that are separate and distinct offenses); cf. State v. Dennis, 537 S.W.2d 652, 654 (Mo.Ct.App.1976) (rape is not continuous offense); Lillard v. State, 528 S.W.2d 207, 211 (Tenn.Crim.App.1975) (defendant who raped woman once ......
-
State v. Morrow, 18935
...944 (Mo.App.1993); State v. Riggs, 770 S.W.2d 361 (Mo.App.1989); State v. Childs, 684 S.W.2d 508 (Mo.App.1984); and State v. Dennis, 537 S.W.2d 652 (Mo.App.1976). Only in Good and Baker was a claim of double jeopardy In Heslop, larceny by defendant of a truck was held to be separate from th......