State v. Dewitt
Decision Date | 31 October 1899 |
Citation | 152 Mo. 76,53 S.W. 429 |
Parties | STATE v. DEWITT. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from circuit court, Texas county; L. B. Woodside, Judge.
W. F. Dewitt was convicted of grand larceny, and appeals. Reversed.
Barton & Dooley, for appellant. Edward C. Crow, Atty. Gen., and Sam B. Jeffries, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
At the November term, 1898, of the circuit court of Texas county, the defendant was convicted of grand larceny, and his punishment fixed at two years' imprisonment in the penitentiary. He appeals.
The indictment was against defendant and one Rude Stark. It is as follows: "The grand jurors for the state of Missouri, duly impaneled, charged, and sworn to inquire within and for the body of the county of Texas, and true presentment make, upon their oath present and charge that one Frank Dewitt and Rude Stark on the 7th day of June in the year 1897, in the county of Texas aforesaid, did then and there feloniously steal, take, and carry away two head of neat cattle, the personal property of one A. C. Street, against the peace and dignity of the state." The indictment was found at the November term, 1897. At the term next following (being the April term, 1898), the cause was continued by the state to the 14th day of November, 1898. On November 25, 1898, defendants filed their motion to quash the indictment upon the ground that it was too indefinite and uncertain, and does not sufficiently set forth the offense to put the defendants on their trial, and does not sufficiently describe the property stolen. The motion was overruled. Defendants then filed their motion for a continuance, which, leaving off the formal parts, is as follows: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Ex parte Redmond
... ... In ... re Stephens, 84 Cal. 77, 24 P. 46; In re ... Mashbir, 44 A.D. 632, 60 N.Y.S. 451; Zachery v ... State, 43 So. 925; State ex rel. Rude v. Young, ... 30 Fla. 85, 11 So. 514; State ex rel. Fowler v ... Finley, 30 Fla. 325, 11 So. 674, 18 L.R.A ... 1057-8; Simpson v. State, -- ... Miss. 15; Burden v. State, 47 S.E. 562; ... Mack v. Smith, 90 S.W. 440, 450; State v ... DeWitt, 152 Mo. 76, 53 S.W. 429; State v ... Williams, 140 Miss. 505; State v. Swisher, 186 ... Mo. 8, 84 S.W. 911; State v. Williams, 186 Mo ... ...
- State v. Schooley
-
The State v. Smith
...if they believed witness Wagner. Whether his testimony should have been believed or disbelieved, was a question for the jury. State v. DeWitt, 152 Mo. 76; State v. Williams, 149 Mo. 496; State Swisher, 186 Mo. 8; State v. Williams, 186 Mo. 128; State v. Harvey, 147 Mo. 69. OPINION FOX, J. T......
-
State v. Schooley
...for the reasons set out in the several affidavits filed by the defendant for a continuance. State v. Maddox, 117 Mo. 667; State v. De Witt, 152 Mo. 76; State v. Hesterley, 182 Mo. 16; State v. Klinger, 43 Mo. 127; McKay v. State, 12 Mo. 492; Sec. 3997, R.S. 1919. (2) The Supreme Court reser......